[PATCH] arm64: dts: juno: update definition for programmable replicator.

Mike Leach mike.leach at linaro.org
Tue Feb 21 04:46:20 PST 2017


The messages are not a normal linux / kernel warning message, but a
result of the offline trace decode process:-

  110739: I_OVERFLOW : Overflow.
  110741: I_ASYNC : Alignment Synchronisation.
  110754: I_TRACE_INFO : Trace Info.; PCTL=0x0
  110757: I_TRACE_ON : Trace On.

If this is sufficient with an explanation I'm happy to add it to the patch.

Mike


On 21 February 2017 at 12:37, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 21/02/17 12:34, Mike Leach wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: CoreSight [mailto:coresight-bounces at lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Sudeep Holla
>>> Sent: 21 February 2017 11:03
>>> To: Mike Leach; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org; coresight at lists.linaro.org;
>>> robh+dt at kernel.org; Sudeep Holla
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: juno: update definition for programmable
>>> replicator.
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> On 17/02/17 19:13, Mike Leach wrote:
>>>> Juno platforms have a programmable replicator splitting the trace
>>>> output to TPIU and ETR. Currently this is not being programmed as it
>>>> is being treated as a none-programmable replicator - which is the
>>>> default operational mode for these devices. The TPIU in the system is
>>>> enabled by default, and this combination is causing back-pressure in
>>>> the trace system resulting in overflows at the source.
>>>>
>>>> Replaces the existing definition with one that defines the
>>>> programmable replicator, using the "qcom,coresight-replicator1x"
>>>> driver that provides the correct functionality for CoreSight programmable
>>> replicators.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I assume this is just enhancement and not a fix.
>>
>> I guess it depends on your point of view - with this update the trace
>> overflows I was seeing disappear, as the trace path to TPIU is
>> blocked. So it affects the quality of collected trace using the ETR
>> rather than a binary didn't work / works now change.
>>
>
> OK, could you add the warning overflow messages if you get, so that it's
> very clear from the change log. Then I can see if it can be pushed as fix.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep



-- 
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Blackburn Design Centre. UK



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list