[PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Fri Oct 28 11:19:14 PDT 2016


On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:43:24AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:

> Do we see this as a chicken and egg situation, or is there any harm
> beyond the pains of supporting an out-of-tree driver for a while, to
> wait until we have at least one other TEE to add to this subsystem
> before merging?

We haven't been overburneded with TEE vendors wanting to get their
driver code into mainline - do we have any reasonable prospect of other
TEE vendors with an interest in mainline turning up in any kind of
reasonable timeframe?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20161028/3adb9948/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list