The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula

Fabio Estevam festevam at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 11:00:53 PDT 2016


Hi Ken,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin at advantech.com> wrote:

> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080 at 60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected.
> I think the patches should fix the issue.

That's good news. Thanks for testing.

Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series.

Emil,

Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list