[PATCH v9 06/11] arm/arm64: vgic: Implement VGICv3 CPU interface access
Vijay Kilari
vijay.kilari at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 23:38:26 PST 2016
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Christoffer Dall
<christoffer.dall at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:31:53PM +0530, vijay.kilari at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar at cavium.com>
>>
>> VGICv3 CPU interface registers are accessed using
>> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS ioctl. These registers are accessed
>> as 64-bit. The cpu MPIDR value is passed along with register id.
>> is used to identify the cpu for registers access.
>>
>> The VM that supports SEIs expect it on destination machine to handle
>> guest aborts and hence checked for ICC_CTLR_EL1.SEIS compatibility.
>> Similarly, VM that supports Affinity Level 3 that is required for AArch64
>> mode, is required to be supported on destination machine. Hence checked
>> for ICC_CTLR_EL1.A3V compatibility.
>>
>> The CPU system register handling is spitted into two files
>
> spitted? Did you mean 'split into' ?
>
>> vgic-sys-reg-common.c and vgic-sys-reg-v3.c.
>> The vgic-sys-reg-common.c handles read and write of VGIC CPU registers
>
> So this is weird because everything in virt/kvm/arm/ is exactly supposed
> to be common between arm and arm64 already.
>
> I would rather that you had a copy of vgic-sys-reg-v3.c in arch/arm/kvm/
> and in arch/arm64/kvm/ each taking care of its own architecture.
>
> But note that I didn't actually require that you implemented support for
> GICv3 migration on AArch32 hosts for these patches, I just didn't want
> thigns to silently break.
>
> If we cannot test the AArch32 implementation, we should potentially just
> make sure that is not supported yet, return a proper error to userspace
> and get the AArch64 host implementation correct.
>
> I suggest you move your:
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c to
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
>
> and rename
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-common.c to
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
>
> And then wait with the AArch32 host side for now, but just make sure it
> compiles and returns an error as opposed to crashing the system if
> someone tries to excercise this interface on an AArch32 host.
I will add arch/arm/kvm/vgic-coproc-v3.c (pls check if file name is ok or not?)
and return -ENXIO as shown below and update document accordingly.
int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
u64 *reg)
{
/*
* TODO: Implement for AArch32
*/
return -ENXIO;
}
int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
u64 *reg)
{
/*
* TODO: Implement for AArch32
*/
return -ENXIO;
}
>
>> for both AArch64 and AArch32 mode. The vgic-sys-reg-v3.c handles AArch64
>> mode and is compiled only for AArch64 mode.
>>
>> Updated arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h with new definitions
>> required to compile for AArch32.
>>
>> The version of VGIC v3 specification is define here
>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.txt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin at samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar at cavium.com>
>> ---
[...]
>> +static bool access_gic_aprn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u8 apr,
>> + u8 idx, unsigned long *reg)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_cpu *vgic_v3_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>> +
>> + /* num_pri_bits are initialized with HW supported values.
>> + * We can rely safely on num_pri_bits even if VM has not
>> + * restored ICC_CTLR_EL1 before restoring APnR registers.
>> + */
>
> nit: commenting style
ok
>
>> + switch (vgic_v3_cpu->num_pri_bits) {
>> + case 7:
>> + vgic_v3_access_apr_reg(vcpu, is_write, apr, idx, reg);
>> + break;
>> + case 6:
>> + if (idx > 1)
>> + goto err;
>> + vgic_v3_access_apr_reg(vcpu, is_write, apr, idx, reg);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + if (idx > 0)
>> + goto err;
>> + vgic_v3_access_apr_reg(vcpu, is_write, apr, idx, reg);
>> + }
>
> It looks to me like userspace can then program active priorities with
> higher numbers than what it will program num_pri_bits to later. Is that
> not weird, or am I missing something?
As long as it is within HW supported priorities it is safe.
>
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +err:
>> + if (!is_write)
>> + *reg = 0;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool access_gic_ap0r_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u8 idx,
>> + unsigned long *reg)
>> +{
>> + return access_gic_aprn(vcpu, is_write, 0, idx, reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool access_gic_ap1r_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u8 idx,
>> + unsigned long *reg)
>> +{
>> + return access_gic_aprn(vcpu, is_write, 1, idx, reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool access_gic_sre_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
>> +
>> + /* Validate SRE bit */
>> + if (is_write) {
>> + if (!(*reg & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE))
>> + return false;
>> + } else {
>> + *reg = vgicv3->vgic_sre;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..82c2f02
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
>> +/*
>> + * VGIC system registers handling functions
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>> +#include "vgic.h"
>> +#include "sys_regs.h"
>> +
>> +#define ACCESS_SYS_REG(REG) \
>> +static bool access_gic_##REG##_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, \
>> + struct sys_reg_params *p, \
>> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) \
>> +{ \
>> + unsigned long tmp; \
>> + bool ret; \
>> + \
>> + if (p->is_write) \
>> + tmp = p->regval; \
>> + ret = access_gic_##REG##_reg(vcpu, p->is_write, &tmp); \
>> + if (!p->is_write) \
>> + p->regval = tmp; \
>> + \
>> + return ret; \
>> +}
>> +
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(ctlr)
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(pmr)
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(bpr0)
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(bpr1)
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(sre)
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(grpen0)
>> +ACCESS_SYS_REG(grpen1)
>> +
>> +#define ACCESS_APNR_SYS_REG(REG) \
>> +static bool access_gic_##REG##_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, \
>> + struct sys_reg_params *p, \
>> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) \
>> +{ \
>> + unsigned long tmp; \
>> + u8 idx = p->Op2 & 3; \
>> + bool ret; \
>> + \
>> + if (p->is_write) \
>> + tmp = p->regval; \
>> + ret = access_gic_##REG##_reg(vcpu, p->is_write, idx, &tmp); \
>> + if (!p->is_write) \
>> + p->regval = tmp; \
>> + \
>> + return ret; \
>> +}
>> +
>> +ACCESS_APNR_SYS_REG(ap0r)
>> +ACCESS_APNR_SYS_REG(ap1r)
>
> I don't get these indirections. Why can't you call the functions
> directly?
The code is same for accessing the registers hence added this indirection.
>
>> +
>> +static const struct sys_reg_desc gic_v3_icc_reg_descs[] = {
>> + /* ICC_PMR_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(4), CRm(6), Op2(0), access_gic_pmr_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_BPR0_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(3), access_gic_bpr0_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP0R0_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(4), access_gic_ap0r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP0R1_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(5), access_gic_ap0r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP0R2_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(6), access_gic_ap0r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP0R3_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(7), access_gic_ap0r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP1R0_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(0), access_gic_ap1r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP1R1_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(1), access_gic_ap1r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP1R2_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(2), access_gic_ap1r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_AP1R3_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(3), access_gic_ap1r_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_BPR1_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(3), access_gic_bpr1_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_CTLR_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(4), access_gic_ctlr_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_SRE_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(5), access_gic_sre_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_IGRPEN0_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(6), access_gic_grpen0_sys_reg },
>> + /* ICC_GRPEN1_EL1 */
>> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(7), access_gic_grpen1_sys_reg },
>> +};
>> +
>> +int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
>> + u64 *reg)
>> +{
>> + struct sys_reg_params params;
>> + u64 sysreg = (id & KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_MASK) | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
>> +
>> + params.regval = *reg;
>> + params.is_write = is_write;
>> + params.is_aarch32 = false;
>> + params.is_32bit = false;
>> +
>> + if (find_reg_by_id(sysreg, ¶ms, gic_v3_icc_reg_descs,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(gic_v3_icc_reg_descs)))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
>> + u64 *reg)
>> +{
>> + struct sys_reg_params params;
>> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r;
>> + u64 sysreg = (id & KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_MASK) | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
>> +
>> + if (is_write)
>> + params.regval = *reg;
>> + params.is_write = is_write;
>> + params.is_aarch32 = false;
>> + params.is_32bit = false;
>> +
>> + r = find_reg_by_id(sysreg, ¶ms, gic_v3_icc_reg_descs,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(gic_v3_icc_reg_descs));
>> + if (!r)
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> + if (!r->access(vcpu, ¶ms, r))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!is_write)
>> + *reg = params.regval;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>> index a3ff04b..6e7400e 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>> @@ -240,6 +240,13 @@ void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vgic_v3->vgic_sre = 0;
>> }
>>
>> + vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.num_id_bits = (kvm_vgic_global_state.ich_vtr_el2 &
>> + ICH_VTR_ID_BITS_MASK) >>
>> + ICH_VTR_ID_BITS_SHIFT;
>> + vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.num_pri_bits = ((kvm_vgic_global_state.ich_vtr_el2 &
>> + ICH_VTR_PRI_BITS_MASK) >>
>> + ICH_VTR_PRI_BITS_SHIFT) + 1;
>> +
>> /* Get the show on the road... */
>> vgic_v3->vgic_hcr = ICH_HCR_EN;
>> }
>> @@ -340,6 +347,7 @@ int vgic_v3_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
>> */
>> kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr = (ich_vtr_el2 & 0xf) + 1;
>> kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2 = false;
>> + kvm_vgic_global_state.ich_vtr_el2 = ich_vtr_el2;
>>
>> if (!info->vcpu.start) {
>> kvm_info("GICv3: no GICV resource entry\n");
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> index 9232791..af23399 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> @@ -140,6 +140,28 @@ int vgic_v3_dist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> int offset, u32 *val);
>> int vgic_v3_redist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> int offset, u32 *val);
>> +int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + u64 id, u64 *val);
>> +int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
>> + u64 *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_ctlr_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_pmr_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_bpr0_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_bpr1_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_grpen0_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_grpen1_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_ap0r_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + u8 idx, unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_ap1r_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + u8 idx, unsigned long *reg);
>> +bool access_gic_sre_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
>> + unsigned long *reg);
>
> nit: since all of this is exported, I would name them vgic_access_ctlr()
> and so on. The _reg postfix is probably also unnecessary for all of
> these.
OK
>
>> int kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type);
>> void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
>> void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list