Low network throughput on i.MX28

[Jörg Krause]

Hi Stefan,

sorry, I forget the link in the previous mail.

On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 20:30 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Jörg,
> 
> > Jörg Krause <joerg.krause at embedded.rocks> hat am 4. November 2016
> > um 19:44
> > geschrieben:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Shawn,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 09:24 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Am 02.11.2016 um 09:14 schrieb Jörg Krause:
> > > > On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 11:08 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > > > Jörg Krause <joerg.krause at embedded.rocks> hat am 29.
> > > > > > Oktober
> > > > > > 2016
> > > > > > um 01:07
> > > > > > geschrieben:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > You mentioned [1] an optimization in the Freescale vendor
> > > > > > Linux
> > > > > > kernel
> > > > > > [2]. I would really like to see this optimization in the
> > > > > > mainline
> > > > > > kernel.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Did you ever tried to port this code from Freescale to
> > > > > > mainline?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, i tried once but i was frustrated soon because of the
> > > > > lot of
> > > > > required
> > > > > changes and resulting issues.
> > > > 
> > > > I got the PIO mode working for the mxs-mmc driver. For this I
> > > > ported
> > > > the PIO code from the vendor kernel and removed the usage of
> > > > the
> > > > DMA
> > > > engine entirely.
> > > 
> > > Good job
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Testing network bandwidth with iperf, I get about ~10Mbit/sec
> > > > with
> > > > PIO
> > > > mode compared to ~6.5Mbit/sec with DMA mode for UDP and about
> > > > ~6.5Mbit/sec compared to ~4.5Mbit/sec with DMA mode for TCP.
> > > 
> > > And how about MMC / sd card performance?
> > 
> > I noticed poor performance with the i.MX28 MMC and/or DMA driver
> > using
> > the mainline kernel compared to the vendor Freescale kernel 2.6.35.
> > I've seen that hou have added the drivers to mainline some years
> > ago.
> > 
> > My custom i.MX28 board has a wifi chip attached to the SSP2
> > interface.
> > Comparing the bandwith with iperf I get >20Mbits/sec on the vendor
> > kernel and <5Mbits/sec on the mainline kernel.
> 
> there is one thing about the clock handling. I noticed that the
> Vendor Kernel
> round up the clock frequency and the Mainline Kernel round down the
> clock
> frequency [1]. So don't trust the clock ratings from DT / board code.
> Better
> verify the register settings or check it with an osci.
> 
> [1] - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg09132.html

I checked the clock rate setting by reading the register 0x80014070
(HW_SSP2_TIMING). CLOCK_DIVIDE is 0x2 and CLOCK_RATE is 0x0. As SSP CLK
is 96MHz this makes a clock rate of 48MHz.

There was a discussion on the mailing list [1] about that tasklets
might be slow.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-February
/043395.html

Jörg