[PATCH] ARM: DT: stm32: move dma translation to board files

Bruno Herrera bruherrera at gmail.com
Wed Nov 2 11:23:07 PDT 2016


On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk
<radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you tried with
>
> sdio {
> ...
> compatible = "arm,primecell";
> arm,primecell-periphid = <id_to_define>;
> ...
> }
>
> This should register proper amba device and give it an ID you wish.

I'm using this:

sdio: sdio at 40012c00 {
compatible = "arm,pl18x", "arm,primecell";
arm,primecell-periphid = <0x00480181>;
reg = <0x40012c00 0x400>;
dmas =  <&dma2 6 4 0x10400 0x3>, /* Logical - DevToMem */
<&dma2 3 4 0x10400 0x3>; /* Logical - MemToDev */
dma-names = "rx", "tx";
clocks = <&rcc 0 171>;
clock-names = "apb_pclk";
interrupts = <49>;
status = "disabled";
};

And on the driver side I added this:

/* STM32 variants */

{

        .id     = 0x00480181,

        .mask   = 0xf0ffffff,

        .data   = &variant_stm32f4x9,

},

My .id field is the .id from variant_ux500 plus one (and what I
believe is not valid).
And I cannot read the ID from STM32 IP because it always return zero.
Maybe someone from ST(@Alex) can get the real ID. ;)


>
> 2016-11-02 17:07 GMT+01:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Alexandre Torgue
>> <alexandre.torgue at st.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On 10/31/2016 07:58 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think wlcore driver searches dma-ranges in its parent that's why sdio
>> >> node needs it.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes I agree. In this case it is needed as you have subnode in sdio node.
>> > So IMO empty dma-ranges could be removed from ethernet and usb node, but
>> > kept in future sdio subnode.
>>
>> Now it is clear.
>>
>> >
>> > Bruno,
>> > Do you plan to push sdio support ?
>>
>> Yes I do, but I'm not sure how long it will take. The I had to
>> change(and hack) the mmci code because I could not get the ID from
>> STM32 SDIO IP.
>> My current WIP is at @
>>
>> https://github.com/mcoquelin-stm32/afboot-stm32/pull/4#issuecomment-247571615
>> I know Andrea Merello is also working on that (and he probably has a
>> more complete patch).
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> 2016-10-31 17:41 GMT+01:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>:
>> >>
>> >>     On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk
>> >>     <radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com <mailto:radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com>>
>> >>     wrote:
>> >>     > This is weird because dma ddresses are recalculated using
>> >> parent's
>> >>     > dma-ranges property and soc already has it so there should be
>> >> absolutely no
>> >>     > problem.
>> >>
>> >>     These are my DTS and DTSI file.
>> >>     >
>> >>     > 2016-10-31 11:27 GMT+01:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> >>     <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>:
>> >>     >>
>> >>     >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Radosław Pietrzyk
>> >>     >> <radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com
>> >>     <mailto:radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>     >> > Have you defined your sdio node within soc node ?
>> >>     >>
>> >>     >> It is in the SOC node of the DSTI file.
>> >>     >>
>> >>     >> >
>> >>     >> > 2016-10-27 14:57 GMT+02:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> >>     <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>:
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> Hi Alex,
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Alexandre Torgue
>> >>     >> >> <alexandre.torgue at st.com <mailto:alexandre.torgue at st.com>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>     >> >> > Hi Bruno,
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> > On 10/27/2016 12:43 PM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >> Hi Alex,
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Alexandre Torgue
>> >>     >> >> >> <alexandre.torgue at st.com <mailto:alexandre.torgue at st.com>>
>> >>     wrote:
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>> Hi Bruno,
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>> On 10/25/2016 11:06 PM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> Hi Alexandre,
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> stm32f469-disco and stm32f429-eval boards use SDRAM
>> >>     start address
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> remapping
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> (to @0) to boost performances. A DMA translation
>> >> through
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> "dma-ranges"
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> property was needed for other masters than the M4 CPU.
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> stm32f429-disco doesn't use remapping so doesn't need
>> >>     this DMA
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> translation.
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> This patches moves this DMA translation definition from
>> >>     stm32f429
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> soc
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> file
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> to board files.
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE
>> >> <alexandre.torgue at st.com
>> >>     <mailto:alexandre.torgue at st.com>>
>> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> index 13c7cd2..a763c15 100644
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                 };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>         };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +       soc {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +               dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0
>> >> 0x10000000>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +       };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>         usbotg_hs_phy: usbphy {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                 #phy-cells = <0>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                 compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> Shouldn't also the peripheral dma-ranges property move
>> >> to
>> >>     board
>> >>     >> >> >>>> specific
>> >>     >> >> >>>> too?
>> >>     >> >> >>>> I  had this patch for while but I didn't had the time to
>> >>     submit:
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>> Well spot I forgot it. Actually, discussing with Arnd
>> >>     ysterday on
>> >>     >> >> >>> IIRC,
>> >>     >> >> >>> empty dma-ranges is not needed. Can you test on your side
>> >> by
>> >>     >> >> >>> removing
>> >>     >> >> >>> dma-ranges in usb node please ?
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >> Unfortunately will take a time for me to set up this
>> >>     environment on
>> >>     >> >> >> the STM32F4-EVAL board.
>> >>     >> >> >> And on the discovery boards we dont have this scenario.
>> >>     That was the
>> >>     >> >> >> main reason I did not submit the patch right away.
>> >>     >> >> >> My conclusion and I might be wrong but is based on the my
>> >>     tests with
>> >>     >> >> >> SDIO device at STM32F469I-DISCO board.
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >> I started this issue as discussion at ST Forum but Maxime
>> >>     gave me
>> >>     >> >> >> the
>> >>     >> >> >> hint.
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://my.st.com/public/STe2ecommunities/mcu/Lists/cortex_mx_stm32/Flat.aspx?RootFolder=https%3a%2f%2fmy%2est%2ecom%2fpublic%2fSTe2ecommunities%2fmcu%2fLists%2fcortex_mx_stm32%2fDMA2%20and%20SYSCFG_MEMRMP%20relationship&FolderCTID=0x01200200770978C69A1141439FE559EB459D7580009C4E14902C3CDE46A77F0FFD06506F5B&currentviews=44
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> <https://my.st.com/public/STe2ecommunities/mcu/Lists/cortex_mx_stm32/Flat.aspx?RootFolder=https%3a%2f%2fmy%2est%2ecom%2fpublic%2fSTe2ecommunities%2fmcu%2fLists%2fcortex_mx_stm32%2fDMA2%20and%20SYSCFG_MEMRMP%20relationship&FolderCTID=0x01200200770978C69A1141439FE559EB459D7580009C4E14902C3CDE46A77F0FFD06506F5B&currentviews=44>
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>> I will push a v2 by removing empty dma-ranges if tests
>> >> are
>> >>     ok in
>> >>     >> >> >>> your
>> >>     >> >> >>> side.
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >> From my understating/conclusion is: when empty
>> >>     property(dma-ranges)
>> >>     >> >> >> is
>> >>     >> >> >> the device node, the mapping will be taken in
>> >> consideration
>> >>     when
>> >>     >> >> >> using
>> >>     >> >> >> DMA otherwise the mapping is ignored.
>> >>     >> >> >> And in the SDIO case it is needed for DEV->MEM(SDRAM) and
>> >>     >> >> >> MEM(SDRAM)->DEV. If it is not the case for the devices in
>> >>     question
>> >>     >> >> >> so
>> >>     >> >> >> I suppose it can work without the property.
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> > For sure translation has to be done but I'm not sure that
>> >> an
>> >>     empty
>> >>     >> >> > "dma-ranges" is needed in device node to activate it. For
>> >>     Ethernet
>> >>     >> >> > empty
>> >>     >> >> > "dma-ranges" is not needed. I will try with usb.
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> In the case of SDIO it is needed. As example this is my
>> >>     working SDIO
>> >>     >> >> node:
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> sdio: sdio at 40012c00 {
>> >>     >> >> compatible = "arm,pl18x", "arm,primecell";
>> >>     >> >> arm,primecell-periphid = <0x00480181>;
>> >>     >> >> reg = <0x40012c00 0x400>;
>> >>     >> >> dmas =  <&dma2 6 4 0x10400 0x3>, /* Logical - DevToMem */
>> >>     >> >> <&dma2 3 4 0x10400 0x3>; /* Logical - MemToDev */
>> >>     >> >> dma-names = "rx", "tx";
>> >>     >> >> clocks = <&rcc 0 171>;
>> >>     >> >> clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>> >>     >> >> interrupts = <49>;
>> >>     >> >> status = "disabled";
>> >>     >> >> };
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> &sdio {
>> >>     >> >> status = "okay";
>> >>     >> >> vmmc-supply = <&wlan_en>;
>> >>     >> >> bus-width = <4>;
>> >>     >> >> max-frequency = <24000000>;
>> >>     >> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> >>     >> >> pinctrl-0 = <&sdio_pins>;
>> >>     >> >> ti,non-removable;
>> >>     >> >> ti,needs-special-hs-handling;
>> >>     >> >> dma-ranges;
>> >>     >> >> cap-power-off-card;
>> >>     >> >> keep-power-in-suspend;
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> #address-cells = <1>;
>> >>     >> >> #size-cells = <0>;
>> >>     >> >> wlcore: wlcore at 0 {
>> >>     >> >> compatible = "ti,wl1835";
>> >>     >> >> reg = <2>;
>> >>     >> >> interrupt-parent = <&gpioa>;
>> >>     >> >> interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> >>     >> >> };
>> >>     >> >> };
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> > alex
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>> Thanks in advance
>> >>     >> >> >>> Alex
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> Author: Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> >>     <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>
>> >>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> Date:   Sun Oct 16 14:50:00 2016 -0200
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>     ARM: DT: STM32: Use dma-ranges property per board
>> >> not
>> >>     at dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>> file
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>> index 6bfc595..2a22a82 100644
>> >>     >> >> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         model = "STMicroelectronics STM32429i-EVAL
>> >> board";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         compatible = "st,stm32429i-eval",
>> >> "st,stm32f429";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +       soc {
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +               dma-ranges = <0xC0000000 0x0
>> >> 0x10000000>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +       };
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         chosen {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                 bootargs = "root=/dev/ram
>> >> rdinit=/linuxrc";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                 stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>> >>     >> >> >>>> @@ -96,6 +100,7 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>  &ethernet0 {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         status = "okay";
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +       dma-ranges;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         pinctrl-0       = <&ethernet0_mii>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         pinctrl-names   = "default";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         phy-mode        = "mii-id";
>> >>     >> >> >>>> @@ -116,6 +121,7 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>  };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>  &usbotg_hs {
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +       dma-ranges;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         dr_mode = "host";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         phys = <&usbotg_hs_phy>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         phy-names = "usb2-phy";
>> >>     >> >> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>> index 7d624a2..697a133 100644
>> >>     >> >> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>         soc {
>> >>     >> >> >>>> -               dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0
>> >> 0x10000000>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                 timer2: timer at 40000000 {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         compatible = "st,stm32-timer";
>> >>     >> >> >>>> @@ -472,13 +471,11 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         st,syscon = <&syscfg 0x4>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         snps,pbl = <8>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         snps,mixed-burst;
>> >>     >> >> >>>> -                       dma-ranges;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         status = "disabled";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                 };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                 usbotg_hs: usb at 40040000 {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         compatible = "snps,dwc2";
>> >>     >> >> >>>> -                       dma-ranges;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         reg = <0x40040000 0x40000>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         interrupts = <77>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>                         clocks = <&rcc 0 29>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> index 0596d60..3a1cfdd 100644
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> @@ -59,8 +59,6 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>         };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>         soc {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> -               dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0
>> >> 0x10000000>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> -
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                 timer2: timer at 40000000 {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                         compatible = "st,stm32-timer";
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                         reg = <0x40000000 0x400>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> index 9e73656..c2213c0 100644
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>         aliases {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>                 serial0 = &usart3;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>         };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +       soc {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +               dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0
>> >> 0x10000000>;
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> +       };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>  };
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>>  &clk_hse {
>> >>     >> >> >>>>> --
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>> Br.,
>> >>     >> >> >>>> Bruno
>> >>     >> >> >>>>
>> >>     >> >> >>>
>> >>     >> >> >
>> >>     >> >>
>> >>     >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>     >> >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> >>     >> >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> >>     <mailto:linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>
>> >>     >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>> >>     <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>
>> >>     >> >
>> >>     >> >
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list