[RFC v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: add *driver_data for different hardware settings

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Fri May 27 02:24:57 PDT 2016


On 27 May 2016 at 08:31, YT Shen <yt.shen at mediatek.com> wrote:
> Hi CK,
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:43 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
>> Hi, YT:
>>
>> One comment below.
>>
>> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 23:05 +0800, yt.shen at mediatek.com wrote:
>> > From: YT Shen <yt.shen at mediatek.com>
>> >
>> > There are some hardware settings changed, between MT8173 & MT2701:
>> > DISP_OVL address offset changed, color format definition changed.
>> > DISP_RDMA fifo size changed.
>> > DISP_COLOR offset changed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen at mediatek.com>
>> > ---
>> > +
>> > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_ovl_get_driver_data(
>> > +   struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > +{
>> > +   const struct of_device_id *of_id =
>> > +           of_match_device(mtk_disp_ovl_driver_dt_match, &pdev->dev);
>> > +
>> > +   return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_rdma_get_driver_data(
>> > +   struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > +{
>> > +   const struct of_device_id *of_id =
>> > +           of_match_device(mtk_disp_rdma_driver_dt_match, &pdev->dev);
>> > +
>> > +   return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_color_get_driver_data(
>> > +   struct device_node *node)
>> > +{
>> > +   const struct of_device_id *of_id =
>> > +           of_match_node(mtk_disp_color_driver_dt_match, node);
>> > +
>> > +   return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data;
>> > +}
>> > +
>>
>> These three functions looks the same with different parameter:
>> mtk_disp_ovl_driver_dt_match, mtk_disp_rdma_driver_dt_match, and
>> mtk_disp_color_driver_dt_match. So merge them to prevent duplicated
>> code.
> OK, I'll do this in the next version.

Also preserve the const-ness of the data - don't cast it away on the
return line.
Note that the function return type (and some of the users of said
functions) should be updated as well.

-Emil



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list