[PATCH] ARM: at91: Add DT support for Olimex SAM9-L9260 board.

[raashidmuhammed]

On 05/19/2016 06:20 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com> wrote:
>> Le 19/05/2016 01:29, Rob Herring a écrit :
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:02:46PM +0530, Raashid Muhammed wrote:
>>>> From: Raashid Muhammed <raashidmuhammed at zilogic.com>
>>>>
>>>> sam9-l9260 is a low cost board designed by Olimex.
>>>>
>>>> More infomation is available at:
>>>> https://www.olimex.com/Products/ARM/Atmel/SAM9-L9260/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raashid Muhammed <raashidmuhammed at zilogic.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Vijay Kumar B. <vijaykumar at bravegnu.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt        |   6 ++
>>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |   1 +
>>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9-l9260.dts                   | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> For AT91-based boards, please use this prefix: "at91-" as stated in the
>> Atmel README file:
>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README#L127
>>
>> So I would recommend this name instead:
>> at91-sam9-l9260.dts
>>
>>
>>>>   3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
>>>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9-l9260.dts
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..0587d63
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>>> +Olimex AT91 Device Tree Bindings
>>>> +--------------------------------
>>> There's not an existing at91 or olimex file this would fit into? We
>>> don't need 1 file per board.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +SAM9-L9260 Board
>>>> +Required root node properties:
>>>> +    - compatible = "olimex,sam9-l9260", "atmel,at91sam9260";
>> I don't think this file is needed at all actually. We have a lot of
>> board files and none of them have a dedicated or particular entry for them.
> Well, they should have one.
>
> Rob

Thanks everyone for your valuable comments. I'll incorporate the changes 
and resend the patch.

Regards,
Raashid