[PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4-nfc"

Yang, Wenyou Wenyou.Yang at atmel.com
Mon May 9 21:50:37 PDT 2016



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh at kernel.org]
> Sent: 2016年5月10日 4:13
> To: Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang at atmel.com>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com>; David Woodhouse
> <dwmw2 at infradead.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>; Mark Brown
> <broonie at kernel.org>; Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree at hellion.org.uk>; Kumar
> Gala <galak at codeaurora.org>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-
> mtd at lists.infradead.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas
> <Nicolas.FERRE at atmel.com>; Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at free-
> electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>;
> Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>; Josh Wu <rainyfeeling at outlook.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4-
> nfc"
> 
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:51:17PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> > It is a datasheet bug, for current SoCs, the RB_EDGE3(i.e. bit 27) of
> > HSMC_SR register does not exist, the RB_EDGE0 (i.e. bit 24) is the
> > ready/busy line edge status bit. So the compatible "atmel,sama5d4-nfc"
> > is unneeded.
> 
> The compatible is needed if the SOC still exists. You can list both for the sama5d4
> if the block is the same.

The NFC IP of SAMA5D4 is same as SAMA5D2's, SAMA5D4 hase this issue.  This compatible can be removed. 


Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list