[PATCH v2 19/54] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Tue May 3 01:26:23 PDT 2016
Hi Eric,
On 02/05/16 13:24, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> minor comment: patch title has been altered since v1, should be
>
> KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq
Indeed, that was line-broken accidentally when I added the Changelog.
Thanks for pointing out!
Cheers,
Andre.
> On 04/28/2016 06:45 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger at linaro.org>
>>
>> Tell KVM whether a particular VCPU has an IRQ that needs handling
>> in the guest. This is used to decide whether a VCPU is runnable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog RFC..v1:
>> - return false if distributor is disabled
>> - add vgic_kick_vcpus() implementations
>>
>> include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h | 2 ++
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h b/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
>> index 5fae4a9..2615205 100644
>> --- a/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
>> +++ b/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
>> @@ -184,6 +184,8 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>> int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
>> bool level);
>>
>> +int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +
>> #define irqchip_in_kernel(k) (!!((k)->arch.vgic.in_kernel))
>> #define vgic_initialized(k) (false)
>> #define vgic_ready(k) ((k)->arch.vgic.ready)
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> index ae52928..eeb766e 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> @@ -519,3 +519,43 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vgic_flush_lr_state(vcpu);
>> spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
>> }
>> +
>> +int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>> + struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> + bool pending = false;
>> +
>> + if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.enabled)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) {
>> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>> + pending = irq->pending && irq->enabled;
>> + spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
>> +
>> + if (pending)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
>> +
>> + return pending;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + int c;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We've injected an interrupt, time to find out who deserves
>> + * a good kick...
>> + */
>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
>> + if (kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(vcpu))
>> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>> + }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> index 81b1a20..0c92cda 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> u32 intid);
>> bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq);
>> +void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
>>
>> void vgic_v2_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list