[PATCH v5 3/6] watchdog: pnx4008: add support for soft reset

[Guenter Roeck]

On 03/01/2016 08:04 AM, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 20:03 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 02/29/2016 09:31 AM, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
>>> From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux at tycoint.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for explicit soft reset using the reboot mode.
>>>
>>> The default reboot mode behavior is unchanged;
>>> you can overwrite the default reboot type in the board specific file
>>> "DT_MACHINE_START" definition using the "reboot_mode" parameter.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux at tycoint.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes from v4 to v5:
>>> - no logical change; updated to work with new revision of patch #2.
>>>
>>> Changes from v3 to v4:
>>> - none.
>>>
>>> Changes from v2 to v3:
>>> - no logical change; updated to work with new revision of patch #2.
>>>
>>> Changes from v1 to v2:
>>> - Rename patch title;
>>>     was "arm: lpc32xx: restart: add support for soft reset"
>>> - Add change to "pnx-4008" driver instead of "mach-lpc32xx".
>>> - Use define available in "pnx-4008" when writting to watchdog register.
>>>
>>>    drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c
>>> index f3be522..e05bfecf 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c
>>> @@ -129,9 +129,16 @@ static int pnx4008_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>>>    static int pnx4008_restart_handler(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>>>    				   unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
>>>    {
>>> -	/* Instant assert of RESETOUT_N with pulse length 1mS */
>>> -	writel(13000, WDTIM_PULSE(wdt_base));
>>> -	writel(M_RES2 | RESFRC1 | RESFRC2, WDTIM_MCTRL(wdt_base));
>>> +	if (mode == (unsigned long)REBOOT_SOFT) {
>>
>> Are those typecasts really necessary ?
>>
>> Guenter
>>
> typecasts are optional; the compare occurred
> between "unsigned long" & "enum reboot_mode" types.
>
> Do you want me to remove them?
>

If they are not needed, they should not be there. Cluttering the core
with unnecessary typecasts only makes it harder to read.

Thanks,
Guenter