[PATCH 10/10] clk: mvebu: Add the peripheral clock driver for Armada 3700
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Jun 30 13:00:07 PDT 2016
On 06/10, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> These clocks are the ones which will be used as source for the
> peripherals of the Armada 3700 SoC. On this SoC there is two blocks of
> clocks: the North bridge one and the South bridge one.
>
> Most of them are gatable. Most of the time their rate are their parent
> rated divided by a ratio depending of two registers. Their parent can be
> choose between the TBG clocks for most of them.
>
> However, some of them can't choose their parent or directly depend of the
> xtal clocks. Other ones do not use exactly the same pattern to find the
> ratio between their parent rate and their rate.
>
> For theses reason each clock is a composite clock and the operations they
s/theses/these/
> use are different depending of the clock.
>
> According to the dataheet it would be possible to select the parent clock
s/dataheet/datasheet/
> and the ratio, however currently the driver does not support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cd5150035426
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
> +/*
> + * Marvell Armada 37xx SoC Peripheral clocks
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Marvell
> + *
> + * Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + *
> + * Most of the peripheral clocks can be modelled like this:
> + * _____ _______ _______
> + * TBG-A-P --| | | | | | ______
> + * TBG-B-P --| Mux |--| /div1 |--| /div2 |--| Gate |--> perip_clk
> + * TBG-A-S --| | | | | | |______|
> + * TBG-B-S --|_____| |_______| |_______|
> + *
> + * However some clocks may use only one or two block or and use the
> + * xtal clock as parent.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
Is this include used?
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
Is this include used?
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define PARENT_NUM 5
> +
> +#define TBG_SEL 0x0
> +#define DIV_SEL0 0x4
> +#define DIV_SEL1 0x8
> +#define DIV_SEL2 0xC
> +#define CLK_SEL 0x10
> +#define CLK_DIS 0x14
> +
> +
> +#define UNUSED 0xFFFF
> +#define XTAL_CHILD 0x1 /* Xtal is the only parent of the clock */
> +#define TBGA_S_CHILD 0x2 /* TBG A S is the only parent of the clock */
> +#define GBE_CORE_CHILD 0x3 /* GBE core is the only parent of the clock */
> +#define GBE_50_CHILD 0x4 /* GBE 50 is the only parent of the clock */
> +#define GBE_125_CHILD 0x5 /* GBE 125 is the only parent of the clock */
> +
> +struct clk_double_div {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + void __iomem *reg1;
> + int shift1;
> + void __iomem *reg2;
> + int shift2;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_clk_double_div(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_double_div, hw)
> +
> +struct clk_periph_data {
> + char *name;
> + int gate_shift;
> + int mux_shift;
> + u32 div_reg1;
> + int div_shift1;
> + u32 div_reg2;
> + int div_shift2;
> + struct clk_div_table *table;
> + int flags;
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_div_table clk_table6[] = {
const?
> + { .val = 1, .div = 1, },
> + { .val = 2, .div = 2, },
> + { .val = 3, .div = 3, },
> + { .val = 4, .div = 4, },
> + { .val = 5, .div = 5, },
> + { .val = 6, .div = 6, },
> + { .val = 0, .div = 0, }, /* laste entry */
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_div_table clk_table1[] = {
const?
> + { .val = 0, .div = 1, },
> + { .val = 1, .div = 2, },
> + { .val = 0, .div = 0, }, /* laste entry */
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_div_table clk_table2[] = {
const?
> + { .val = 0, .div = 2, },
> + { .val = 1, .div = 4, },
> + { .val = 0, .div = 0, }, /* laste entry */
s/laste/last/ 3 times
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_periph_data data_nb[] = {
const?
> +
> +struct clk_periph_data data_sb[] = {
const?
> +
> +const char *gbe_name[] = {
const char * const?
> + "gbe-50", "gbe-core", "gbe-125",
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_periph_driver_data {
> + struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +
> +static int get_div(void __iomem *reg, int shift)
Should this return unsigned instead?
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = (readl(reg) >> shift) & 0x7;
> + if (val > 6)
> + return 0;
> + return (unsigned int)val;
What is this cast for?
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long clk_double_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_double_div *double_div = to_clk_double_div(hw);
> + unsigned int div;
> +
> + div = get_div(double_div->reg1, double_div->shift1);
> + div *= get_div(double_div->reg2, double_div->shift2);
> +
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, div);
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops clk_double_div_ops = {
static?
> + .recalc_rate = clk_double_div_recalc_rate,
> +};
> +
> +static int armada_3700_add_composite_clk(const struct clk_periph_data *data,
> + const char * const *parent_name,
> + void __iomem *reg, spinlock_t *lock,
> + struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + const struct clk_ops *mux_ops = NULL, *gate_ops = NULL,
> + *div_ops = NULL;
> + struct clk_hw *mux_hw = NULL, *gate_hw = NULL, *div_hw = NULL;
> + const char * const *names;
> + struct clk_mux *mux = NULL;
> + struct clk_gate *gate = NULL;
> + struct clk_divider *div = NULL;
> + struct clk_double_div *double_div = NULL;
> + int num_parent;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (data->gate_shift != UNUSED) {
> + gate = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!gate)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + gate->reg = reg + CLK_DIS;
> + gate->bit_idx = data->gate_shift;
> + gate->lock = lock;
> + gate_ops = &clk_gate_ops;
> + gate_hw = &gate->hw;
> + }
> +
> + if (data->mux_shift != UNUSED) {
> + mux = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!mux) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_gate;
> + }
> +
> + mux->reg = reg + TBG_SEL;
> + mux->shift = data->mux_shift;
> + mux->mask = 0x3;
> + mux->lock = lock;
> + mux_ops = &clk_mux_ro_ops;
> + mux_hw = &mux->hw;
> + }
> +
> + if (data->div_reg1 != UNUSED) {
> + if (data->div_reg2 == UNUSED) {
> + const struct clk_div_table *clkt;
> + int table_size = 0;
> +
> + div = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*div), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!div) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_mux;
> + }
> +
> + div->reg = reg + data->div_reg1;
> + div->table = data->table;
> + for (clkt = div->table; clkt->div; clkt++)
> + table_size++;
> + div->width = order_base_2(table_size);
> + div->lock = lock;
> + div_ops = &clk_divider_ro_ops;
> + div_hw = &div->hw;
> + } else {
> + double_div = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*double_div),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!double_div) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_mux;
> + }
> +
> + double_div->reg1 = reg + data->div_reg1;
> + double_div->shift1 = data->div_shift1;
> + double_div->reg2 = reg + data->div_reg1;
> + double_div->shift2 = data->div_shift2;
> + div_ops = &clk_double_div_ops;
> + div_hw = &double_div->hw;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + switch (data->flags) {
> + case XTAL_CHILD:
> + /* the xtal clock is the 5th clock */
> + names = &parent_name[4];
> + num_parent = 1;
> + break;
> + case TBGA_S_CHILD:
> + /* the TBG A S clock is the 3rd clock */
> + names = &parent_name[2];
> + num_parent = 1;
> + break;
> + case GBE_CORE_CHILD:
> + names = &gbe_name[1];
> + num_parent = 1;
> + break;
> + case GBE_50_CHILD:
> + names = &gbe_name[0];
> + num_parent = 1;
> + break;
> + case GBE_125_CHILD:
> + names = &gbe_name[2];
> + num_parent = 1;
> + break;
> + default:
> + names = parent_name;
> + num_parent = 4;
> + }
> + clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, data->name,
Please pass a dev here, it may be useful one day.
> + names, num_parent,
> + mux_hw, mux_ops,
> + div_hw, div_ops,
> + gate_hw, gate_ops,
> + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
Why not ret = PTR_ERR(clk)?
> + goto free_div;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +free_div:
> + devm_kfree(dev, div);
> + devm_kfree(dev, double_div);
> +free_mux:
> + devm_kfree(dev, mux);
> +free_gate:
> + devm_kfree(dev, gate);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id armada_3700_periph_clock_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-3700-periph-clock-nb",
> + .data = data_nb, },
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-3700-periph-clock-sb",
> + .data = data_sb, },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, armada_3700_periph_clock_of_match);
> +
> +static int armada_3700_periph_clock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct clk_periph_driver_data *driver_data;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + const char *parent_name[PARENT_NUM];
> + const struct clk_periph_data *data;
> + const struct of_device_id *device;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int num_periph = 0, i, ret;
> + struct resource *res;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> +
> + device = of_match_device(armada_3700_periph_clock_of_match, dev);
> + if (!device)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + data = device->data;
We have of_device_get_match_data() to simplify this.
> +
> + while (data[num_periph].name)
> + num_periph++;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + reg = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Could not map the periph clock registers\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(reg);
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_clk_parent_fill(np, parent_name, PARENT_NUM);
> + if (ret != PARENT_NUM) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Could not retrieve the parents\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + driver_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct clk_periph_driver_data),
sizeof(*driver_data) please
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!driver_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + driver_data->clk_data.clk_num = num_periph;
> + driver_data->clk_data.clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_periph,
> + sizeof(struct clk *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!driver_data->clk_data.clks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Again, move to clk_hw based registration.
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&driver_data->lock);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_periph; i++) {
> + struct clk *clk = driver_data->clk_data.clks[i];
> +
> + if (armada_3700_add_composite_clk(&data[i], parent_name, reg,
> + &driver_data->lock, dev, clk))
> + dev_err(dev, "Can't register periph clock %s\n",
> + data[i].name);
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get,
> + &driver_data->clk_data);
> + if (ret) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num_periph; i++)
> + clk_unregister(driver_data->clk_data.clks[i]);
It would be nice if we had devm_* registration in composite
clks
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, driver_data);
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list