[PATCH v4 1/3] gpio: xgene: Enable X-Gene standby GPIO as interrupt controller
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Jan 26 02:34:59 PST 2016
On 26/01/16 07:22, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> Enable X-Gene standby GPIO controller as interrupt controller to provide
> its own resources. This avoids ambiguity where GIC interrupt resource is
> use as X-Gene standby GPIO interrupt resource in user driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Y Vo <yvo at apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <qnguyen at apm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c | 331 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 276 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
> index 282004d..b703114 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@
> * AppliedMicro X-Gene SoC GPIO-Standby Driver
> *
> * Copyright (c) 2014, Applied Micro Circuits Corporation
> - * Author: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh at apm.com>.
> - * Y Vo <yvo at apm.com>.
> + * Author: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh at apm.com>.
> + * Y Vo <yvo at apm.com>.
> + * Quan Nguyen <qnguyen at apm.com>.
> *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> @@ -22,14 +23,20 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> #include "gpiolib.h"
>
> -#define XGENE_MAX_GPIO_DS 22
> -#define XGENE_MAX_GPIO_DS_IRQ 6
> +#define XGENE_MAX_NGPIO 22
> +#define XGENE_MAX_NIRQ 6
> +#define XGENE_IRQ_START_PIN 8
> +#define SBGPIO_XGENE ((XGENE_IRQ_START_PIN << 24) | \
> + (XGENE_MAX_NIRQ << 16) | \
> + (XGENE_MAX_NGPIO << 8))
>
> #define GPIO_MASK(x) (1U << ((x) % 32))
>
> @@ -39,19 +46,30 @@
> #define MPA_GPIO_IN_ADDR 0x02a4
> #define MPA_GPIO_SEL_LO 0x0294
>
> +#define GPIO_INT_LEVEL_H 0x000001
> +#define GPIO_INT_LEVEL_L 0x000000
> +
> /**
> * struct xgene_gpio_sb - GPIO-Standby private data structure.
> * @gc: memory-mapped GPIO controllers.
> - * @irq: Mapping GPIO pins and interrupt number
> - * nirq: Number of GPIO pins that supports interrupt
> + * @regs: GPIO register base offset
> + * @irq_domain: GPIO interrupt domain
> + * flags: GPIO per-instance flags assigned by the driver
nit: missing @ before "flags".
> */
> struct xgene_gpio_sb {
> struct gpio_chip gc;
> - u32 *irq;
> - u32 nirq;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> + u32 flags;
> };
>
> -static void xgene_gpio_set_bit(struct gpio_chip *gc, void __iomem *reg, u32 gpio, int val)
> +#define IRQ_START_PIN(priv) (((priv)->flags >> 24) & 0xff)
> +#define NIRQ_MAX(priv) (((priv)->flags >> 16) & 0xff)
> +#define NGPIO_MAX(priv) (((priv)->flags >> 8) & 0xff)
> +#define START_PARENT_IRQ(priv) ((priv)->flags & 0xff)
> +
So flags is actually a set of fields, all 8bits, called irq_start, nirq,
ngpio, and parent_irq_base (or something along those lines).
You might as well make that explicit in your structure, as there is
hardly any point in hiding this information behind a bag of bits and a
set of obscure accessors...
> +static void xgene_gpio_set_bit(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> + void __iomem *reg, u32 gpio, int val)
> {
> u32 data;
>
> @@ -63,23 +81,216 @@ static void xgene_gpio_set_bit(struct gpio_chip *gc, void __iomem *reg, u32 gpio
> gc->write_reg(reg, data);
> }
>
> -static int apm_gpio_sb_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, u32 gpio)
> +static int xgene_gpio_sb_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + int gpio = d->hwirq + IRQ_START_PIN(priv);
> + int lvl_type;
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> + lvl_type = GPIO_INT_LEVEL_H;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> + lvl_type = GPIO_INT_LEVEL_L;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(&priv->gc, gpio);
This has no business whatsoever in set_type. This should be done either
when the GPIO is activated as an IRQ in the domain "activate" method, or
in the "startup" method of the irqchip.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(priv->gc.parent,
> + "Unable to configure XGene GPIO standby pin %d as IRQ\n",
> + gpio);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if ((gpio >= IRQ_START_PIN(priv)) &&
> + (d->hwirq < NIRQ_MAX(priv))) {
How can we end-up here if your GPIO is not part that range? This should
be guaranteed by construction.
> + xgene_gpio_set_bit(&priv->gc, priv->regs + MPA_GPIO_SEL_LO,
> + gpio * 2, 1);
> + xgene_gpio_set_bit(&priv->gc, priv->regs + MPA_GPIO_INT_LVL,
> + d->hwirq, lvl_type);
> + }
> +
> + /* Propagate IRQ type setting to parent */
> + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> + return irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
> + else
> + return irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
> +}
> +
> +static void xgene_gpio_sb_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> + gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&priv->gc, d->hwirq + IRQ_START_PIN(priv));
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip xgene_gpio_sb_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "sbgpio",
> + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
> + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> + .irq_mask = irq_chip_mask_parent,
> + .irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent,
> + .irq_set_type = xgene_gpio_sb_irq_set_type,
> + .irq_shutdown = xgene_gpio_sb_irq_shutdown,
> +};
> +
> +static int xgene_gpio_sb_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, u32 gpio)
> {
> struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
> + unsigned int virq;
> +
> + if ((gpio < IRQ_START_PIN(priv)) ||
> + (gpio > NIRQ_MAX(priv) + IRQ_START_PIN(priv)))
> + return -ENXIO;
> + if (gc->parent->of_node)
> + fwspec.fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(gc->parent->of_node);
> + else
> + fwspec.fwnode = gc->parent->fwnode;
> + fwspec.param_count = 2;
> + fwspec.param[0] = gpio - IRQ_START_PIN(priv);
> + fwspec.param[1] = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> + virq = irq_find_mapping(priv->irq_domain, gpio - IRQ_START_PIN(priv));
> + if (!virq)
> + virq = irq_domain_alloc_irqs(priv->irq_domain, 1,
> + NUMA_NO_NODE, &fwspec);
You should not use these low-level functions directly. Use
irq_create_fwspec_mapping, which will do the right thing.
> + return virq;
> +}
> +
> +static void xgene_gpio_sb_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_data *irq_data)
> +{
> + struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = d->host_data;
> + u32 gpio = irq_data->hwirq + IRQ_START_PIN(priv);
>
> - if (priv->irq[gpio])
> - return priv->irq[gpio];
> + if ((gpio < IRQ_START_PIN(priv)) ||
> + (gpio > NIRQ_MAX(priv) + IRQ_START_PIN(priv)))
> + return;
Again, how can this happen?
>
> - return -ENXIO;
> + xgene_gpio_set_bit(&priv->gc, priv->regs + MPA_GPIO_SEL_LO,
> + gpio * 2, 1);
This seems to program the interrupt to be active on a low level. Why?
Isn't that what set_type is supposed to do?
> +}
> +
> +static void xgene_gpio_sb_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_data *irq_data)
> +{
> + struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = d->host_data;
> + u32 gpio = irq_data->hwirq + IRQ_START_PIN(priv);
It really feels like you need a hwirq_to_gpio() accessor.
> +
> + if ((gpio < IRQ_START_PIN(priv)) ||
> + (gpio > NIRQ_MAX(priv) + IRQ_START_PIN(priv)))
> + return;
Why do we need this?
> +
> + xgene_gpio_set_bit(&priv->gc, priv->regs + MPA_GPIO_SEL_LO,
> + gpio * 2, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int xgene_gpio_sb_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> + unsigned long *hwirq,
> + unsigned int *type)
> +{
> + if (fwspec->param_count != 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + *hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> + *type = fwspec->param[1];
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int xgene_gpio_sb_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
> +{
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
> + struct irq_fwspec parent_fwspec;
> + struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = domain->host_data;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + unsigned int type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> + unsigned int i;
> + u32 ret;
> +
> + ret = xgene_gpio_sb_domain_translate(domain, fwspec, &hwirq, &type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
How can this fail here?
> +
> + hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> + if ((hwirq >= NIRQ_MAX(priv)) ||
> + (hwirq + nr_irqs > NIRQ_MAX(priv)))
> + return -EINVAL;
How can this happen?
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> + irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
> + &xgene_gpio_sb_irq_chip, priv);
> +
> + if (is_of_node(domain->parent->fwnode)) {
> + parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> + parent_fwspec.param_count = 3;
> + parent_fwspec.param[0] = 0;/* SPI */
> + /* Skip SGIs and PPIs*/
> + parent_fwspec.param[1] = hwirq + START_PARENT_IRQ(priv) - 32;
> + parent_fwspec.param[2] = fwspec->param[1];
> + } else if (is_fwnode_irqchip(domain->parent->fwnode)) {
> + parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> + parent_fwspec.param_count = 2;
> + parent_fwspec.param[0] = hwirq + START_PARENT_IRQ(priv);
> + parent_fwspec.param[1] = fwspec->param[1];
> + } else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs,
> + &parent_fwspec);
> +}
> +
> +static void xgene_gpio_sb_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *d;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> + d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq + i);
> + irq_domain_reset_irq_data(d);
> + }
> }
>
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops xgene_gpio_sb_domain_ops = {
> + .translate = xgene_gpio_sb_domain_translate,
> + .alloc = xgene_gpio_sb_domain_alloc,
> + .free = xgene_gpio_sb_domain_free,
> + .activate = xgene_gpio_sb_domain_activate,
> + .deactivate = xgene_gpio_sb_domain_deactivate,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_of_match[] = {
> + {.compatible = "apm,xgene-gpio-sb", .data = (const void *)SBGPIO_XGENE},
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xgene_gpio_sb_of_match);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match[] = {
> + {"APMC0D15", SBGPIO_XGENE},
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match);
> +#endif
> +
> static int xgene_gpio_sb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv;
> - u32 ret, i;
> - u32 default_lines[] = {0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D};
> + u32 ret;
> struct resource *res;
> void __iomem *regs;
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> + struct irq_domain *parent_domain = NULL;
>
> priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!priv)
> @@ -90,6 +301,32 @@ static int xgene_gpio_sb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(regs))
> return PTR_ERR(regs);
>
> + priv->regs = regs;
> +
> + of_id = of_match_device(xgene_gpio_sb_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (of_id)
> + priv->flags = (uintptr_t)of_id->data;
Wait. Everything is hardcoded? So why do we have to deal with looking
into that structure if nothing is actually parametrized?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> + else {
> + const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
> +
> + acpi_id = acpi_match_device(xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match,
> + &pdev->dev);
> + if (acpi_id)
> + priv->flags = (uintptr_t)acpi_id->driver_data;
> + }
> +#endif
nit: you can write this as
if (of_id) {
...
#ifdef ...
} else {
...
#endif
}
Which preserves the Linux coding style.
> + ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (ret > 0) {
> + priv->flags &= ~0xff;
> + priv->flags |= irq_get_irq_data(ret)->hwirq & 0xff;
> + parent_domain = irq_get_irq_data(ret)->domain;
> + }
This is rather ugly. You have the interrupt-parent property. Why don't
you look it up, and do a irq_find_matching_fwnode? Also, what guarantee
do you have that the interrupts are going to be sorted in the DT? There
is no such garantee in the documentation.
> + if (!parent_domain) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to obtain parent domain\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> ret = bgpio_init(&priv->gc, &pdev->dev, 4,
> regs + MPA_GPIO_IN_ADDR,
> regs + MPA_GPIO_OUT_ADDR, NULL,
> @@ -97,36 +334,34 @@ static int xgene_gpio_sb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - priv->gc.to_irq = apm_gpio_sb_to_irq;
> - priv->gc.ngpio = XGENE_MAX_GPIO_DS;
> -
> - priv->nirq = XGENE_MAX_GPIO_DS_IRQ;
> + priv->gc.to_irq = xgene_gpio_sb_to_irq;
> + priv->gc.ngpio = NGPIO_MAX(priv);
So we do have duplicated information everywhere. Great.
>
> - priv->irq = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(u32) * XGENE_MAX_GPIO_DS,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv->irq)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->nirq; i++) {
> - priv->irq[default_lines[i]] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> - xgene_gpio_set_bit(&priv->gc, regs + MPA_GPIO_SEL_LO,
> - default_lines[i] * 2, 1);
> - xgene_gpio_set_bit(&priv->gc, regs + MPA_GPIO_INT_LVL, i, 1);
> - }
> + priv->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(parent_domain,
> + 0, NIRQ_MAX(priv),
> + of_node_to_fwnode(pdev->dev.of_node),
> + &xgene_gpio_sb_domain_ops, priv);
> + if (!priv->irq_domain)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> + priv->gc.irqdomain = priv->irq_domain;
>
> ret = gpiochip_add_data(&priv->gc, priv);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register X-Gene GPIO Standby driver\n");
> - else
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "X-Gene GPIO Standby driver registered\n");
> -
> - if (priv->nirq > 0) {
> - /* Register interrupt handlers for gpio signaled acpi events */
> - acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(&priv->gc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "failed to register X-Gene GPIO Standby driver\n");
> + if (priv->irq_domain)
How can that not be true, given that you've tested irq_domain just above?
> + irq_domain_remove(priv->irq_domain);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "X-Gene GPIO Standby driver registered\n");
> +
> + /* Register interrupt handlers for gpio signaled acpi events */
> + acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(&priv->gc);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -134,28 +369,14 @@ static int xgene_gpio_sb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct xgene_gpio_sb *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> - if (priv->nirq > 0) {
> - acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(&priv->gc);
> - }
> + acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(&priv->gc);
> +
> + irq_domain_remove(priv->irq_domain);
>
> gpiochip_remove(&priv->gc);
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct of_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_of_match[] = {
> - {.compatible = "apm,xgene-gpio-sb", },
> - {},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xgene_gpio_sb_of_match);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static const struct acpi_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match[] = {
> - {"APMC0D15", 0},
> - {},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match);
> -#endif
> -
> static struct platform_driver xgene_gpio_sb_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "xgene-gpio-sb",
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list