[PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds

[Nishanth Menon]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy at ti.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>> >>
>> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts     2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts  2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>> >
>> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>
>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>
> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> cycle?

personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon