[PATCH v11 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing

[Christoffer Dall]

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:14:11PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> 
> When calling perf_event_create_kernel_counter to create perf_event,
> assign a overflow handler. Then when the perf event overflows, set the
> corresponding bit of guest PMOVSSET register. If this counter is enabled
> and its interrupt is enabled as well, kick the vcpu to sync the
> interrupt.
> 
> On VM entry, if there is counter overflowed, inject the interrupt with
> the level set to 1. Otherwise, inject the interrupt with the level set
> to 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones at redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c    |  2 ++
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h |  2 ++
>  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c    | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index dda1959..f54264c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm.h>
>  #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include "trace.h"
> @@ -577,6 +578,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		 * non-preemptible context.
>  		 */
>  		preempt_disable();
> +		kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(vcpu);
>  		kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(vcpu);
>  		kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(vcpu);
>  
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 1f4bfa2..44a3c75 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
> +static inline void kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index c8ea825..5f983cb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
>  
>  /**
>   * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> @@ -180,6 +181,52 @@ void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate - flush pmu state to cpu
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + *
> + * Inject virtual PMU IRQ if IRQ is pending for this cpu.
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +	u64 overflow;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!(vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMCR_E))
> +		return;

are we modeling the PMU interrupt as level-triggered?

In that case, shouldn't we lower the interrupt line on flush when
PMCR_EL0.E == 0 ?


Thanks,
-Christoffer