[PATCH 1/4] mailbox/omap: store mailbox interrupt type in omap_mbox_device

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 04/07/2016 03:24 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Grygorii,
>
> On 04/07/2016 05:32 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 02:37 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> The interrupt type used for identifying the layout of the interrupt
>>> configuration registers between OMAP4+ SoCs and older SoCs is stored
>>> only in the sub-mailbox structures for easier access. Store this type
>>> in the the omap_mbox_device structure as well along with the other
>>> global variables. This is being done to facilitate the context save
>>> and restore of appropriate registers during system suspend/resume.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c | 2 ++
>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c
>>> b/drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c
>>> index 84cafc02e761..adf37f494690 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c
>>> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct omap_mbox_device {
>>>        void __iomem *mbox_base;
>>>        u32 num_users;
>>>        u32 num_fifos;
>>> +    u32 intr_type;
>>>        struct omap_mbox **mboxes;
>>>        struct mbox_controller controller;
>>>        struct list_head elem;
>>> @@ -828,6 +829,7 @@ static int omap_mbox_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>        mdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>        mdev->num_users = num_users;
>>>        mdev->num_fifos = num_fifos;
>>> +    mdev->intr_type = intr_type;
>>>        mdev->mboxes = list;
>>>
>>>        /* OMAP does not have a Tx-Done IRQ, but rather a Tx-Ready IRQ */
>>>
>>
>> This smth. which definitely has to be done using compatible props.
>> Why not to pass more info through of_device_id->data?
>>
>
> Yeah, that's already the case, intr_type is a local variable assigned
> from compatible match data. This patch merely caches it in the
> omap_mbox_device structure so that it can be leveraged by the PM
> callback functions in the next patch.
>

Ah ok. Thanks for explanation.

-- 
regards,
-grygorii