[PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: relax Image placement rules

Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Thu Sep 24 09:38:54 PDT 2015


On 24 September 2015 at 09:37, Suzuki K. Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com> wrote:
> On 23/09/15 01:37, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> This is a followup to the "arm64: update/clarify/relax Image and FDT
>> placement
>> rules" series I sent a while ago:
>> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/407148)
>>
>> This has now been split in two series: this second series deals with the
>> physical and virtual placement of the kernel Image.
>>
>> This series updates the mapping of the kernel Image and the linear mapping
>> of
>> system memory to allow more freedom in the choice of placement without
>> affecting
>> the accessibility of system RAM below the kernel Image, and the mapping
>> efficiency (i.e., memory can always be mapped in 512 MB or 1 GB blocks).
>>
>
> Ard,
>
> I gave your series a quick run and dumping the kernel page tables(with
> CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP)
> I find this problem :
>
> ...
>
> ---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
> 0xffffffbffc000000-0xffffffbffc600000           6M     RW x  SHD AF
> MEM/NORMAL    *****
> 0xffffffbffc600000-0xffffffbffc7f5000        2004K     RW x  SHD AF    UXN
> MEM/NORMAL
> 0xffffffbffc7f5000-0xffffffbffc875000         512K     RW NX SHD AF    UXN
> MEM/NORMAL
> 0xffffffbffc875000-0xffffffbffca00000        1580K     RW x  SHD AF    UXN
> MEM/NORMAL
> ---[ Linear Mapping ]---
> 0xffffffc000000000-0xffffffc040000000           1G     RW NX SHD AF    UXN
> MEM/NORMAL
>
>
> Note that the first mapping in the kernel doesn't have UXN set, which is a
> regression.
> I haven't started digging into it yet, but I thought I will point it out
> here, in case you
> already fixed it.
>

Ok, thanks for pointing that out. I will look into it.

> Note: I see that you have used CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES to handle
> section/table mapping
> (which I have tried to cleanup in 16K page size series and which is not
> merged yet).
> We should be careful when we merge our patches, as we could miss such new
> cases.
>

I was aware of this, and I think it makes sense to the 16 KB pages to
be merged first, and then I will rebase these patches on top of it.

-- 
Ard.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list