[PATCH resend] extcon: Fix attached value returned by is_extcon_changed

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi,

On 2015년 09월 21일 20:29, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 21-09-15 03:36, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2015년 09월 20일 21:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> is_extcon_changed should only check the idx-th bit of new, not
>>> the entirety of new when setting attached.
>>>
>>> This fixes extcon sending notifications that a cable was inserted when
>>> it gets removed while another cable is still connected.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> index a07addd..8dd0af1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int find_cable_index_by_name(struct extcon_dev *edev, const char *name)
>>>   static bool is_extcon_changed(u32 prev, u32 new, int idx, bool *attached)
>>>   {
>>>       if (((prev >> idx) & 0x1) != ((new >> idx) & 0x1)) {
>>> -        *attached = new ? true : false;
>>> +        *attached = ((new >> idx) & 0x1) ? true : false;
>>>           return true;
>>>       }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This patch was already applied[1].
>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=extcon-next
> 
> Yet it is not in 4.3-rc1, applying the patch to your tree is not useful
> unless you also send a pull-req to get the changes in your tree actually
> merged ...

No. It is useful step. It is first step to send pull-request for including the main tree.
I'll send pull-request before releasing official version.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi