[PATCH v3 12/16] KVM: arm64: handle pending bit for LPIs in ITS emulation
p.fedin at samsung.com
Mon Oct 12 04:39:26 PDT 2015
> Shouldn't we also have 'break' here? If vgic_queue_irq() returns false, this means we have no
> LRs to use, therefore it makes no sense to keep iterating.
No, don't listen to me. :) Because of piggyback, we indeed have to recheck all the interrupts.
P.S. I still sometimes lose LPIs, and this is not related to spurious injection fix, because i
tried to omit resetting irq_pending_on_cpu bit, and still lost some LPIs. Will try to compare with
v2, because with v2 i don't remember this problem.
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
More information about the linux-arm-kernel