[PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ
schwab at suse.de
Tue Oct 6 04:52:24 PDT 2015
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin at arm.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> writes:
>> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
>> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
>> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
>> > enough for a couple of function calls".
>> The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ
> Whether it's valid to expect SIGSTKSZ to be big enough for that is
This is tracked in <https://bugs.python.org/issue22503>.
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab at suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the linux-arm-kernel