[PATCH RFC 18/27] drivers: cpu-pd: Add PM Domain governor for CPUs

[Lina Iyer]

On Thu, Nov 19 2015 at 01:50 -0700, Marc Titinger wrote:
>On 18/11/2015 19:42, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 03:37:42PM -0700, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>>A PM domain comprising of CPUs may be powered off when all the CPUs in
>>>the domain are powered down. Powering down a CPU domain is generally a
>>>expensive operation and therefore the power performance trade offs
>>>should be considered. The time between the last CPU powering down and
>>>the first CPU powering up in a domain, is the time available for the
>>>domain to sleep. Ideally, the sleep time of the domain should fulfill
>>>the residency requirement of the domains' idle state.
>>>
>>>To do this effectively, read the time before the wakeup of the cluster's
>>>CPUs and ensure that the domain's idle state sleep time guarantees the
>>>QoS requirements of each of the CPU, the PM QoS CPU_DMA_LATENCY and the
>>>state's residency.
>>
>>To me this information should be part of the CPUidle governor (it is
>>already there), we should not split the decision into multiple layers.
>>
>>The problem you are facing is that the CPUidle governor(s) do not take
>>cross cpus relationship into account, I do not think that adding another
>>decision layer in the power domain subsystem helps, you are doing that
>>just because adding it to the existing CPUidle governor(s) is invasive.
>>
>>Why can't we use the power domain work you put together to eg disable
>>idle states that share multiple cpus and make them "visible" only
>>when the power domain that encompass them is actually going down ?
>>
>>You could use the power domains information to detect states that
>>are shared between cpus.
>>
>>It is just an idea, what I am saying is that having another governor in
>>the power domain subsytem does not make much sense, you split the
>>decision in two layers while there is actually one, the existing
>>CPUidle governor and that's where the decision should be taken.
>>
>>Thoughts appreciated.
>
>Maybe this is silly and not thought-through, but I wonder if the 
>responsibilities could be split or instance with an outer control loop 
>that has the heuristic to compute the next tick time, and the required 
>cpu-power needed during that time slot, and an inner control loop 
>(genpd) that has a per-domain QoS and can optimize power consumption.
>
Not sure I understand everything you said, but the heuristics across a
bunch of CPUs can be very erratic. Its hard enough for menu governor to
determine heuristics on a per-cpu basis.

I governor in this patch already takes care of PM QoS, but does not do a
per-cpu QoS.

We should discuss this more.

-- Lina

>Marc.
>
>>
>>Lorenzo
>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer at linaro.org>
>>>---
>>>  drivers/base/power/cpu-pd.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/base/power/cpu-pd.c b/drivers/base/power/cpu-pd.c
>>>index 617ce54..a00abc1 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/base/power/cpu-pd.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/base/power/cpu-pd.c
>>>@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>  #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>>>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
>>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>+#include <linux/tick.h>
>>>
>>>  #define CPU_PD_NAME_MAX 36
>>>
>>>@@ -66,6 +67,86 @@ static void get_cpus_in_domain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>>>  	}
>>>  }
>>>
>>>+static bool cpu_pd_down_ok(struct dev_pm_domain *pd)
>>>+{
>>>+	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(pd);
>>>+	struct cpu_pm_domain *cpu_pd = to_cpu_pd(genpd);
>>>+	int qos = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
>>>+	u64 sleep_ns = ~0;
>>>+	ktime_t earliest;
>>>+	int cpu;
>>>+	int i;
>>>+
>>>+	/* Reset the last set genpd state, default to index 0 */
>>>+	genpd->state_idx = 0;
>>>+
>>>+	/* We dont want to power down, if QoS is 0 */
>>>+	if (!qos)
>>>+		return false;
>>>+
>>>+	/*
>>>+	 * Find the sleep time for the cluster.
>>>+	 * The time between now and the first wake up of any CPU that
>>>+	 * are in this domain hierarchy is the time available for the
>>>+	 * domain to be idle.
>>>+	 */
>>>+	earliest.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
>>>+	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpu_pd->cpus, cpu_online_mask) {
>>>+		struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>>>+		struct gpd_timing_data *td;
>>>+
>>>+		td = &dev_gpd_data(cpu_dev)->td;
>>>+
>>>+		if (earliest.tv64 < td->next_wakeup.tv64)
>>>+			earliest = td->next_wakeup;
>>>+	}
>>>+
>>>+	sleep_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(earliest, ktime_get()));
>>>+	if (sleep_ns <= 0)
>>>+		return false;
>>>+
>>>+	/*
>>>+	 * Find the deepest sleep state that satisfies the residency
>>>+	 * requirement and the QoS constraint
>>>+	 */
>>>+	for (i = genpd->state_count - 1; i > 0; i--) {
>>>+		u64 state_sleep_ns;
>>>+
>>>+		state_sleep_ns = genpd->states[i].power_off_latency_ns +
>>>+			genpd->states[i].power_on_latency_ns +
>>>+			genpd->states[i].residency_ns;
>>>+
>>>+		/*
>>>+		 * If we cant sleep to save power in the state, move on
>>>+		 * to the next lower idle state.
>>>+		 */
>>>+		if (state_sleep_ns > sleep_ns)
>>>+		       continue;
>>>+
>>>+		/*
>>>+		 * We also dont want to sleep more than we should to
>>>+		 * gaurantee QoS.
>>>+		 */
>>>+		if (state_sleep_ns < (qos * NSEC_PER_USEC))
>>>+			break;
>>>+	}
>>>+
>>>+	if (i >= 0)
>>>+		genpd->state_idx = i;
>>>+
>>>+	return  (i >= 0) ? true : false;
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>+static bool cpu_stop_ok(struct device *dev)
>>>+{
>>>+	return true;
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>+struct dev_power_governor cpu_pd_gov = {
>>>+	.power_down_ok = cpu_pd_down_ok,
>>>+	.stop_ok = cpu_stop_ok,
>>>+};
>>>+
>>>  static int cpu_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct cpu_pm_domain *pd = to_cpu_pd(genpd);
>>>@@ -183,7 +264,7 @@ int of_register_cpu_pm_domain(struct device_node *dn,
>>>
>>>  	/* Register the CPU genpd */
>>>  	pr_debug("adding %s as CPU PM domain.\n", pd->genpd->name);
>>>-	ret = of_pm_genpd_init(dn, pd->genpd, &simple_qos_governor, false);
>>>+	ret = of_pm_genpd_init(dn, pd->genpd, &cpu_pd_gov, false);
>>>  	if (ret) {
>>>  		pr_err("Unable to initialize domain %s\n", dn->full_name);
>>>  		return ret;
>>>--
>>>2.1.4
>>>
>