[PATCHv2 2/2] arm64: Allow changing of attributes outside of modules

Xishi Qiu qiuxishi at huawei.com
Fri Nov 13 00:27:25 PST 2015


On 2015/11/11 9:57, Laura Abbott wrote:

> Currently, the set_memory_* functions that are implemented for arm64
> are restricted to module addresses only. This was mostly done
> because arm64 maps normal zone memory with larger page sizes to
> improve TLB performance. This has the side effect though of making it
> difficult to adjust attributes at the PAGE_SIZE granularity. There are
> an increasing number of use cases related to security where it is
> necessary to change the attributes of kernel memory. Add functionality
> to the page attribute changing code under a Kconfig to let systems
> designers decide if they want to make the trade off of security for TLB
> pressure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at fedoraproject.org>
> ---
> v2: Re-worked to account for the full range of addresses. Will also just
> update the section blocks instead of splitting if the addresses are aligned
> properly.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig       |  12 ++++
>  arch/arm64/mm/mm.h       |   3 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c      |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  4 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 851fe11..46725e8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -521,6 +521,18 @@ config ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
>  
>  source "mm/Kconfig"
>  
> +config DEBUG_CHANGE_PAGEATTR
> +	bool "Allow all kernel memory to have attributes changed"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  If this option is selected, APIs that change page attributes
> +	  (RW <-> RO, X <-> NX) will be valid for all memory mapped in
> +	  the kernel space. The trade off is that there may be increased
> +	  TLB pressure from finer grained page mapping. Turn on this option
> +	  if security is more important than performance
> +
> +	  If in doubt, say Y
> +
>  config SECCOMP
>  	bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
>  	---help---
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mm.h b/arch/arm64/mm/mm.h
> index ef47d99..7b0dcc4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mm.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
>  extern void __init bootmem_init(void);
>  
>  void fixup_init(void);
> +
> +void split_pud(pud_t *old_pud, pmd_t *pmd);
> +void split_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, pte_t *pte);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 496c3fd..9353e3c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void __init *early_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>  /*
>   * remap a PMD into pages
>   */
> -static void split_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, pte_t *pte)
> +void split_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, pte_t *pte)
>  {
>  	unsigned long pfn = pmd_pfn(*pmd);
>  	unsigned long addr = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> index 3571c73..4a95fed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -15,25 +15,162 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  
> -struct page_change_data {
> -	pgprot_t set_mask;
> -	pgprot_t clear_mask;
> -};
> +#include "mm.h"
>  
> -static int change_page_range(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, unsigned long addr,
> -			void *data)
> +static int update_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> +				unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> +				pgprot_t clear, pgprot_t set)
>  {
> -	struct page_change_data *cdata = data;
> -	pte_t pte = *ptep;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (pmd_sect(*pmd)) {
> +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_CHANGE_PAGEATTR)) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		pte = pte_alloc_one_kernel(&init_mm, addr);
> +		if (!pte) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		split_pmd(pmd, pte);
> +		__pmd_populate(pmd, __pa(pte), PMD_TYPE_TABLE);
> +	}
> +
> +
> +	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> +	if (pte_none(*pte)) {
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	do {
> +		pte_t p = *pte;
> +
> +		p = clear_pte_bit(p, clear);
> +		p = set_pte_bit(p, set);
> +		set_pte(pte, p);
> +
> +	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> +
> +out:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int update_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> +				unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> +				pgprot_t clear, pgprot_t set)
> +{
> +	pmd_t *pmd;
> +	unsigned long next;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (pud_sect(*pud)) {
> +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_CHANGE_PAGEATTR)) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		pmd = pmd_alloc_one(&init_mm, addr);
> +		if (!pmd) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		split_pud(pud, pmd);
> +		pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, pmd);
> +	}
> +
>  
> -	pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, cdata->clear_mask);
> -	pte = set_pte_bit(pte, cdata->set_mask);
> +	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> +	if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	do {
> +		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		if (((addr | end) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {

Hi Laura,

Why not like this?
		if (pmd_sect(*pmd) && ((addr | nest) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {

> +			unsigned long paddr = pmd_pfn(*pmd) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +			pgprot_t prot = __pgprot((pmd_val(*pmd) ^ paddr));
> +
> +			pgprot_val(prot) &= ~pgprot_val(clear);
> +			pgprot_val(prot) |= pgprot_val(set);
> +			set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(paddr | pgprot_val(prot)));
> +		} else {
> +			err = update_pte_range(mm, pmd, addr, next, clear, set);
> +		}
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	} while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> +out:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int update_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> +					unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> +					pgprot_t clear, pgprot_t set)
> +{
> +	pud_t *pud;
> +	unsigned long next;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> +	if (pud_none(*pud)) {
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
> -	set_pte(ptep, pte);
> -	return 0;
> +	do {
> +		next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		if (pud_sect(*pud) && ((addr | next) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0) {
> +			unsigned long paddr = pud_pfn(*pud) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +			pgprot_t prot = __pgprot(pud_val(*pud) ^ paddr);
> +
> +			pgprot_val(prot) &= ~pgprot_val(clear);
> +			pgprot_val(prot) |= pgprot_val(set);
> +			set_pud(pud, __pud(paddr | pgprot_val(prot)));
> +		} else {
> +			err = update_pmd_range(mm, pud, addr, next, clear, set);
> +		}
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	} while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end);
> +
> +out:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int update_page_range(unsigned long addr,
> +				unsigned long end, pgprot_t clear,
> +				pgprot_t set)
> +{
> +	pgd_t *pgd;
> +	unsigned long next;
> +	int err;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = &init_mm;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(addr >= end);
> +	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
> +	if (pgd_none(*pgd)) {
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	do {
> +		next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		err = update_pud_range(mm, pgd, addr, next, clear, set);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> +
> +out:
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> @@ -43,7 +180,6 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>  	unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
>  	unsigned long end = start + size;
>  	int ret;
> -	struct page_change_data data;
>  
>  	if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr)) {
>  		start &= PAGE_MASK;
> @@ -51,17 +187,15 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END)
> +	if (start < PAGE_OFFSET && !is_vmalloc_addr((void *)start) &&
> +		(start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END))

How about abstracting "start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END" to a new function?
e.g. is_module_addr(), however it is a little confusion with is_module_address().

>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END)
> +	if (end < PAGE_OFFSET && !is_vmalloc_addr((void *)end) &&
> +		(end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  

It will not filter this case, start in module range and end in vmalloc range, right?
start and end should be both in one range.

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

> -	data.set_mask = set_mask;
> -	data.clear_mask = clear_mask;
> -
> -	ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, start, size, change_page_range,
> -					&data);
> +	ret = update_page_range(addr, end, clear_mask, set_mask);
>  
>  	flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>  	return ret;






More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list