[PATCH v3 0/7] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
k.kozlowski at samsung.com
Thu Nov 5 16:18:17 PST 2015
On 05.11.2015 14:27, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> On Tuesday 03 November 2015 07:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26.10.2015 21:55, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>> This patch series is a part of continuation work from following series
>>>  and .
>>> 1: exynos: Move pmu driver to driver/soc folder and add exynos7 support
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39797.html from
>>> Amit Daniel Kacchap
>>> 2: soc: samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/7/12 from me
>> +Cc Bartlomiej,
>> There were some concerns for previous versions of this patchset. I
>> cannot find all of them (e.g. Bartlomiej's are not present on lkml.org
>> anymore) so I am not sure if they were addressed properly.
> Yes. If I recall correctly he has following main concerns:
> 1: To convert exynos-pmu to a proper platform driver before moving out
> of arch/arm/mach-exynos. This is already addressed.
> 2: Do we really need common driver for both ARM and ARM64? I feel yes,
> as at least I can see that driver's basic structure will be reused. As
> in case of PMU driver most of lines of code is data part (register
> offset and its values in different mode), that part will be kept in
> separate file e.g. exynos7-pmu.c or exynosXXXX-pmu.c.
> There has been already one attempt of submission for exynos7 PMU driver at:
> 3: He had a concern that in case of ARM64 build most of ARM related code
> will be present in binary which will be dead code, that can be addressed
> by excluding ARM based SoC exynosXXXX-pmu.c file in Makefile.
> It has been taken care in v3 7/7 patch in drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile.
Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe someone will have other comments but for
me it's okay. When sending next version, please CC linux-pm mailing list
and arm-soc maintainers (Arnd, Olof, Kevin).
More information about the linux-arm-kernel