[RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support

Zhou Wang wangzhou1 at hisilicon.com
Mon May 25 02:52:09 PDT 2015


On 2015/5/25 13:10, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>>
>> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
>> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
>> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>>> 	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>> 		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>> 		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>> 		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>> 					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>> 	}
>> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
>> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
>> help to test it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1 at hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128 +++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
> 
> +cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
> 

Thanks to involve more related guys to this discussion :)

> Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
> 
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> 

OK, will do in next version patch.

>>  
>>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>  
>> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x)		(((x) & 0x7) << 16)
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET		0x91C
>>  
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
>> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>>  
>>  static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>>  
>> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
>> -
>> -	return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>>  int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>>  	*val = readl(addr);
>> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos0, i;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
>>  				       order_base_2(no_irqs));
>> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos;
>>  	struct msi_msg msg;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
>>  {
>>  	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>>  	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
>>  }
>> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>>  	.map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
>>  };
>>  
>> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
>>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>>  	struct of_pci_range range;
>>  	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>>  	struct resource *cfg_res;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(res);
>>  	u32 val, na, ns;
>>  	const __be32 *addrp;
>>  	int i, index, ret;
>> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>>  	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -	dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
>> -	dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/*
>> +	 * FIXME: we should really be able to use
>> +	 * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
>> +	 * but the conversion needs some more testing
>> +	 */
>> +	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> +		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> +		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> +		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>> +					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>> +	}
>> +	pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
>> +				pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
>> +	pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
>> +#else
>> +	ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
>> +			      pp, &res);
>> +	if (!bus)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> +	bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
>> +#else
>> +	bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -	dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
>> -	dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
>> +	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> +	if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> +		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>  
>> -	pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
>> +	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>  static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  			int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
>> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>>  			int where, int size, u32 val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
>> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>>  	.write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp;
>> -
>> -	pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> -		sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
>> -		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> -		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> -		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>> -					sys->io_offset);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
>> -	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
>> -	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
>> -
>> -	return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pci_bus *bus;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> 
> 'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
> However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
> in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
> each host controller.
> 
> So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
> it makes the problem.
> 

'sys->busnr' is set as "0, busn_res.end + 1 ..." in pcibios_init_hw() I think:

pcibios_init_hw()
	for (nr = busnr = 0; nr < hw->nr_controllers; nr++)
		sys->busnr = busnr;
		...
		busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;

and it indicates root bus number of one pcie controller.
so in dw_pcie_scan_bus:
	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
	bus = pci_create_root_bus(..., sys->busnr, ...);
we set root bus number as "0, busn_res.end + 1". But in pcie-designware,
nr_controllers is set as 1, so it only comes into the loop in
pcibios_init_hw() one time.

so how about we set 0 as default value of pp->root_bus_nr, then use
pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res);
to create root bus?

> Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
> 
> 1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
> 
> e.g)
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>                         return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>         pp = &pcie->pp;
>         pp->dev = pcie->dev;
>         pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> 
> 2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
> 
> I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
> 
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
>> -				  &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
>> -	if (!bus)
>> -		return NULL;
>> -
>> -	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> -
>> -	if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> -		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>> -
>> -	return bus;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
>> -	int irq;
>> -
>> -	irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
>> -	if (!irq)
>> -		irq = pp->irq;
>> -
>> -	return irq;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
>> -	.setup		= dw_pcie_setup,
>> -	.scan		= dw_pcie_scan_bus,
>> -	.map_irq	= dw_pcie_map_irq,
>> -};
> 
> Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
> ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
> 

Many thanks for your reviewing!
Zhou Wang

>> -
>>  void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	u32 val;
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> .
> 





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list