[PATCH v2] amba-pl011: simplify TX handling

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:02:47AM +0100, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici at wp.pl>
> 
> Since pre-git era PL011 used an elaborate scheme to load data
> to TX FIFO.  Only TX IRQ handler was loading data into the FIFO,
> which required the IRQ to fire before any transmission started
> (to load the first batch of characters).  Initial IRQ was fired
> by putting UART into loopback mode and writing an arbitrary
> character during .startup().
> 
> Unfortunately some PL011-compatible UART (most notably BCM2708
> in Raspberry Pi) would transmit the arbitrary character even
> though the device was in loopback mode.  Commit 734745caeb9f
> ("serial/amba-pl011: Activate TX IRQ passively") solved this
> issue by loading the first batch explicitly from .start_tx()
> handler.  It employed quite a complex scheme involving IRQ
> counting and a delayed work.
> 
> f2ee6dfa0e85 ("serial/amba-pl011: Leave the TX IRQ alone when
> the UART is not open") was an attempt to optimise the loading
> by assuming that when the device is opened second time TX IRQ
> from the previous transmission will still be pending.  This
> assumption is incorrect if the device is closed with FIFO full
> because FIFO will be programmatically flushed and therefore no
> IRQ will be pending on next .open().
> 
> This patch simplifies the code and fixes above problem. It should
> also make things a bit more efficient as the FIFO was not filled
> properly after the driver seen more than two IRQs.
> 
> Fixes: f2ee6dfa0e85 ("serial/amba-pl011: Leave the TX IRQ alone when the UART is not open")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici at wp.pl>
> ---
> v2:
>  - don't try to load FIFO from outside of IRQ handler
>    if IRQ is unmasked (change to pl011_start_tx_pio());
>  - don't check for FIFO_FULL at the end of load from IRQ;
>  - remove unnecessary newlines.
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 113 +++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)

As I think this does much the same thing Dave Martin's patch does, I
want him to ack this before I can accept it.

thanks,

greg k-h