[PATCH v9 2/4] pinctrl: cygnus: add gpio/pinconf driver
Ray Jui
rjui at broadcom.com
Wed Mar 4 09:37:14 PST 2015
Hi Linus,
On 3/4/2015 1:48 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Ray Jui <rjui at broadcom.com> wrote:
>
>> This adds the initial support of the Broadcom Cygnus GPIO/PINCONF driver
>> that supports all 3 GPIO controllers on Cygnus including the ASIU GPIO
>> controller, the chipCommonG GPIO controller, and the always-on GPIO
>> controller. Basic PINCONF configurations such as bias pull up/down, and
>> drive strength are also supported in this driver.
>>
>> Pins from the ASIU GPIO controller can be individually muxed to GPIO
>> function, through interaction with the Cygnus IOMUX controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui at broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden at broadcom.com>
>
> OK!
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
> (...)
>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>
> This should be:
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>
>> +static u32 cygnus_readl(struct cygnus_gpio *chip, unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> + return readl(chip->base + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cygnus_writel(struct cygnus_gpio *chip, unsigned int offset,
>> + u32 val)
>> +{
>> + writel(val, chip->base + offset);
>> +}
>
> If these look like so, just use readl(val, chip->base +
> offset)/writel() at all sites.
> These functions just adds a pointless layer of abstraction.
>
>> +static void cygnus_set_bit(struct cygnus_gpio *chip, unsigned int reg,
>> + unsigned gpio, int set)
>
> "set" should be bool, right?
>
>> +{
>> + unsigned int offset = CYGNUS_GPIO_REG(gpio, reg);
>> + unsigned int shift = CYGNUS_GPIO_SHIFT(gpio);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val = cygnus_readl(chip, offset);
>> + if (set)
>> + val |= BIT(shift);
>> + else
>> + val &= ~BIT(shift);
>> + cygnus_writel(chip, offset, val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int cygnus_get_bit(struct cygnus_gpio *chip, unsigned int reg,
>> + unsigned gpio)
>
> This should be bool right, not int?
>
>> +{
>> + unsigned int offset = CYGNUS_GPIO_REG(gpio, reg);
>> + unsigned int shift = CYGNUS_GPIO_SHIFT(gpio);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val =
>> + if (val)
>> + return 1;
>> + else
>> + return 0;
>
> Just:
> return !!(cygnus_readl(chip, offset) & BIT(shift));
>
> Both of these are a bit overzealous like the readl/writel functions above,
> consider just inlining them.
>
>> +static int cygnus_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>> +{
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + struct cygnus_gpio *chip = to_cygnus_gpio(gc);
>> + unsigned gpio = d->hwirq;
>> + int int_type = 0, dual_edge = 0, edge_lvl = 0;
>
> It looks like some of these should be bool.
>
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
>> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>> + edge_lvl = 1;
>
> = true;
>
> etc.
>
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
>> + dual_edge = 1;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>> + int_type = 1;
>> + edge_lvl = 1;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
>> + int_type = 1;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid GPIO IRQ type 0x%x\n",
>> + type);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->lock, flags);
>> + cygnus_set_bit(chip, CYGNUS_GPIO_IN_TYPE_OFFSET, gpio, int_type);
>> + cygnus_set_bit(chip, CYGNUS_GPIO_INT_DE_OFFSET, gpio, dual_edge);
>> + cygnus_set_bit(chip, CYGNUS_GPIO_INT_EDGE_OFFSET, gpio,
>> + edge_lvl);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(chip->dev,
>> + "gpio:%u set int_type:%d dual_edge:%d edge_lvl:%d\n",
>> + gpio, int_type, dual_edge, edge_lvl);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> (...)
>> +/*
>> + * Request the Cygnus IOMUX pinmux controller to mux individual pins to GPIO
>> + */
>> +static int cygnus_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
>> +{
>> + struct cygnus_gpio *chip = to_cygnus_gpio(gc);
>> + unsigned gpio = gc->base + offset;
>> +
>> + /* not all Cygnus GPIO pins can be muxed individually */
>> + if (!chip->pinmux_is_supported)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return pinctrl_request_gpio(gpio);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cygnus_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
>> +{
>> + struct cygnus_gpio *chip = to_cygnus_gpio(gc);
>> + unsigned gpio = gc->base + offset;
>> +
>> + if (!chip->pinmux_is_supported)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pinctrl_free_gpio(gpio);
>> +}
>
> Nice!
>
>> +static const struct pinconf_ops cygnus_pconf_ops = {
>> + .is_generic = true,
>> + .pin_config_get = cygnus_pin_config_get,
>> + .pin_config_set = cygnus_pin_config_set,
>> +};
>
> This pin config thing looks really nice.
>
>> +/*
>> + * Map a GPIO in the local gpio_chip pin space to a pin in the Cygnus IOMUX
>> + * pinctrl pin space
>> + */
>> +struct cygnus_gpio_pin_range {
>> + unsigned offset;
>> + unsigned pin_base;
>> + unsigned num_pins;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define CYGNUS_PINRANGE(o, p, n) { .offset = o, .pin_base = p, .num_pins = n }
>
> Aha so this mapping is really very sparse...
>
>> +/*
>> + * Pin mapping table for mapping local GPIO pins to Cygnus IOMUX pinctrl pins
>> + */
>> +static const struct cygnus_gpio_pin_range cygnus_gpio_pintable[] = {
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(0, 42, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(1, 44, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(4, 48, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(5, 50, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(8, 126, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(9, 155, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(10, 152, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(11, 154, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(12, 153, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(13, 127, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(16, 140, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(17, 145, 7),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(24, 130, 10),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(34, 141, 4),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(38, 54, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(39, 56, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(42, 60, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(45, 64, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(48, 68, 2),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(50, 84, 6),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(56, 94, 6),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(62, 72, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(63, 70, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(64, 80, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(65, 74, 3),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(68, 78, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(69, 82, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(70, 156, 17),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(87, 104, 12),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(99, 102, 2),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(101, 90, 4),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(105, 116, 10),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(123, 11, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(124, 38, 4),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(128, 43, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(129, 47, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(130, 49, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(131, 53, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(132, 55, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(133, 59, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(134, 63, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(135, 67, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(136, 71, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(137, 73, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(138, 77, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(139, 79, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(140, 81, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(141, 83, 1),
>> + CYGNUS_PINRANGE(142, 10, 1)
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The Cygnus IOMUX controller mainly supports group based mux configuration,
>> + * but certain pins can be muxed to GPIO individually. Only the ASIU GPIO
>> + * controller can support this, so it's an optional configuration
>> + *
>> + * Return -ENODEV means no support and that's fine
>> + */
>> +static int cygnus_gpio_pinmux_add_range(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node = chip->dev->of_node;
>> + struct device_node *pinmux_node;
>> + struct platform_device *pinmux_pdev;
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = &chip->gc;
>> + int i, ret = 0;
>> +
>> + /* parse DT to find the phandle to the pinmux controller */
>> + pinmux_node = of_parse_phandle(node, "pinmux", 0);
>> + if (!pinmux_node)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + pinmux_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(pinmux_node);
>> + /* no longer need the pinmux node */
>> + of_node_put(pinmux_node);
>> + if (!pinmux_pdev) {
>> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to get pinmux device\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* now need to create the mapping between local GPIO and PINMUX pins */
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cygnus_gpio_pintable); i++) {
>> + ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(gc, dev_name(&pinmux_pdev->dev),
>> + cygnus_gpio_pintable[i].offset,
>> + cygnus_gpio_pintable[i].pin_base,
>> + cygnus_gpio_pintable[i].num_pins);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(chip->dev, "unable to add GPIO pin range\n");
>> + goto err_put_device;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> This is really nice. Awesome job, exactly how it should be done,
> even if it's a bit complex.
>
>> + chip->pinmux_is_supported = (ret == 0);
>
> Just = true;
>
> You cannot get here with ret != 0.
>
>> +static void cygnus_gpio_pinmux_remove_range(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)
>> +{
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = &chip->gc;
>> +
>> + if (chip->pinmux_is_supported)
>> + gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(gc);
>> +}
>
> You don't need to do this. Look in gpiochip_remove() and you see it
> will remove the range for you.
>
> +
>> +err_unregister_pinconf:
>> + cygnus_gpio_unregister_pinconf(chip);
>> +
>> +err_rm_range:
>> + cygnus_gpio_pinmux_remove_range(chip);
>
> Not needed I think.
>
>> +
>> +err_rm_gpiochip:
>> + gpiochip_remove(gc);
>
> Because this will do it.
>
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> Apart from that this looks really good!
>
> If you resend with the above nitpicks fixed I will merge this.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Great! I will address all comments and re-send a BIG patch series with
the other pinctrl patch series consolidated.
Thanks!
Ray
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list