[PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU

Lukasz Majewski l.majewski at samsung.com
Wed Mar 4 02:38:31 PST 2015


Hi Chanwoo,

> This patch adds the support for Exynos5433's TMU (Thermal Management
> Unit). Exynos5433 has a little different register bit fields as
> following description:
> - Support the eight trip points for rising/falling interrupt by using
> two registers
> - Read the calibration type (1-point or 2-point) and sensor id from
> TRIMINFO register
> - Use a little different register address
> 
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi at samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 161
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h |   1 + 2 files changed, 157
> insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index 1d30b09..1bb2fb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,32 @@
>  #define EXYNOS4412_MUX_ADDR_VALUE          6
>  #define EXYNOS4412_MUX_ADDR_SHIFT          20
>  
> +/* Exynos5433 specific registers */
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_CONTROL1		0x024
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_SAMPLING_INTERVAL	0x02c
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_COUNTER_VALUE0		0x030
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_COUNTER_VALUE1		0x034
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_CURRENT_TEMP1	0x044
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE3_0		0x050
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE7_4		0x054
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL3_0		0x060
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL7_4		0x064
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTEN		0x0c0
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND		0x0c8
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON			0x110
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_PD_DET_EN		0x130
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_SHIFT	16
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_SHIFT	23
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_MASK	\
> +			(0xf << EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_SHIFT)
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_MASK	BIT(23)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING	0
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING	1
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5433_PD_DET_EN			1
> +
>  /*exynos5440 specific registers*/
>  #define EXYNOS5440_TMU_S0_7_TRIM		0x000
>  #define EXYNOS5440_TMU_S0_7_CTRL		0x020
> @@ -484,6 +510,101 @@ out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int exynos5433_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
> +	struct thermal_zone_device *tz = data->tzd;
> +	unsigned int status, trim_info;
> +	unsigned int rising_threshold = 0, falling_threshold = 0;
> +	unsigned long temp, temp_hist;
> +	int ret = 0, threshold_code, i, sensor_id, cal_type;
> +
> +	status = readb(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_STATUS);
> +	if (!status) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	trim_info = readl(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO);
> +	sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
> +
> +	/* Read the temperature sensor id */
> +	sensor_id = (trim_info & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_MASK)
> +				>>
> EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_SHIFT;
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Temperature sensor ID: 0x%x\n",
> sensor_id); +

	Isn't dev_info a bit too noisy? IMHO, dev_dbg would be enough
	here.

	Please consider this globally.

> +	/* Read the calibration mode */
> +	writel(trim_info, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO);
> +	cal_type = (trim_info & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_MASK)
> +				>>
> EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_SHIFT; +
> +	switch (cal_type) {
> +	case EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING:
> +		pdata->cal_type = TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING;
> +		break;
> +	case EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING:
> +		pdata->cal_type = TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		pdata->cal_type = TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING;
> +		break;
> +	};
> +
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Calibration type is %d-point
> calibration\n",
> +			cal_type ?  2 : 1);
> +
> +	/* Write temperature code for rising and falling threshold */
> +	for (i = 0; i < of_thermal_get_ntrips(tz); i++) {
> +		int rising_reg_offset, falling_reg_offset;
> +		int j = 0;
> +
> +		switch (i) {
> +		case 0:
> +		case 1:
> +		case 2:
> +		case 3:
> +			rising_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE3_0;
> +			falling_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL3_0;
> +			j = i;
> +			break;
> +		case 4:
> +		case 5:
> +		case 6:
> +		case 7:
> +			rising_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE7_4;
> +			falling_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL7_4;
> +			j = i - 4;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Write temperature code for rising threshold */
> +		tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, i, &temp);
> +		temp /= MCELSIUS;
> +		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, temp);
> +
> +		rising_threshold = readl(data->base +
> rising_reg_offset);
> +		rising_threshold |= (threshold_code << j * 8);
> +		writel(rising_threshold, data->base +
> rising_reg_offset); +
> +		/* Write temperature code for falling threshold */
> +		tz->ops->get_trip_hyst(tz, i, &temp_hist);
> +		temp_hist = temp - (temp_hist / MCELSIUS);
> +		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, temp_hist);
> +
> +		falling_threshold = readl(data->base +
> falling_reg_offset);
> +		falling_threshold &= ~(0xff << j * 8);
> +		falling_threshold |= (threshold_code << j * 8);
> +		writel(falling_threshold, data->base +
> falling_reg_offset);
> +	}
> +
> +	data->tmu_clear_irqs(data);
> +out:
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int exynos5440_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -682,7 +803,8 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct
> platform_device *pdev, bool on) 
>  	if (on) {
>  		con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
> -		con |= (1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
> +		if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> +			con |= (1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);

	Isn't exynos7 implying that we already have SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7?
	Why do we need this extra check?

>  		interrupt_en =
>  			(of_thermal_is_trip_valid(tz, 7)
>  			<< EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE7_SHIFT) |
> @@ -705,11 +827,20 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct
> platform_device *pdev, bool on) interrupt_en <<
> EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT; } else {
>  		con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
> -		con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
> +		if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> +			con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
>  		interrupt_en = 0; /* Disable all interrupts */
>  	}
>  
> -	writel(interrupt_en, data->base + EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> +	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) {
> +		int pd_det_en = on ? EXYNOS5433_PD_DET_EN : 0;
> +
> +		writel(pd_det_en, data->base +
> EXYNOS5433_TMU_PD_DET_EN);
> +		writel(interrupt_en, data->base +
> EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> +	} else {
> +		writel(interrupt_en, data->base +
> EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> +	}
> +
>  	writel(con, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL);
>  }
>  
> @@ -770,6 +901,8 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct
> exynos_tmu_data *data, 
>  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
>  		emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> +	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> +		emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
>  	else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
>  		emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
>  	else
> @@ -882,6 +1015,9 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct
> exynos_tmu_data *data) } else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
>  		tmu_intstat = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
>  		tmu_intclear = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
> +	} else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) {
> +		tmu_intstat = EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
> +		tmu_intclear = EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
>  	} else {
>  		tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT;
>  		tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR;
> @@ -926,6 +1062,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> exynos_tmu_match[] = { { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-tmu", },
>  	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu", },
>  	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu-ext-triminfo", },
> +	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-tmu", },
>  	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-tmu", },
>  	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos7-tmu", },
>  	{ /* sentinel */ },
> @@ -949,6 +1086,8 @@ static int exynos_of_get_soc_type(struct
> device_node *np) else if (of_device_is_compatible(np,
>  					 "samsung,exynos5420-tmu-ext-triminfo"))
>  		return SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO;
> +	else if (of_device_is_compatible(np,
> "samsung,exynos5433-tmu"))
> +		return SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433;
>  	else if (of_device_is_compatible(np,
> "samsung,exynos5440-tmu")) return SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440;
>  	else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "samsung,exynos7-tmu"))
> @@ -1069,6 +1208,13 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct
> platform_device *pdev) data->tmu_set_emulation =
> exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation; data->tmu_clear_irqs =
> exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs; break;
> +	case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433:
> +		data->tmu_initialize = exynos5433_tmu_initialize;
> +		data->tmu_control = exynos7_tmu_control;

I must frankly admit that I'm a bit confused.

I'm curious why we didn't either define totally separate set of
exynos5433_tmu_* functions or reusing existing exynos7_tmu_* ?

Are exynos7 and exynos5433 so much different?

> +		data->tmu_read = exynos4412_tmu_read;
> +		data->tmu_set_emulation =
> exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation;
> +		data->tmu_clear_irqs = exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs;
> +		break;
>  	case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440:
>  		data->tmu_initialize = exynos5440_tmu_initialize;
>  		data->tmu_control = exynos5440_tmu_control;
> @@ -1172,7 +1318,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) goto err_clk_sec;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
> +	switch (data->soc) {
> +	case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433:
> +	case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7:
>  		data->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tmu_sclk");
>  		if (IS_ERR(data->sclk)) {
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sclk\n");
> @@ -1184,7 +1332,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) goto err_clk;
>  			}
>  		}
> -	}
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	};
>  
>  	ret = exynos_tmu_initialize(pdev);
>  	if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h index 4d71ec6..440c714 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum soc_type {
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260,
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420,
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO,
> +	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433,
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440,
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7,
>  };



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list