[Patch v5 4/6] PCI/ACPI: Consolidate common PCI host bridge code into ACPI core
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Wed Jun 10 09:48:22 PDT 2015
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:58:15PM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/6/10 0:12, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >> +struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> >> + struct acpi_pci_root_ops *ops,
> >> + struct acpi_pci_root_info *info,
> >> + void *sysdata, int segment, int node)
> > I do not think you need to pass segment and node, they clutter the
> > function signature when you can retrieve them from root, I would
> > make them local variables and use root->segment and acpi_get_node
> > in the function body to retrieve them.
> On x86, node and segment may be overridden under certain conditions.
> For example, segment will always be 0 if 'pci_ignore_seg' is set.
Ok, so the question would be then why do you not override the value
in root->segment then (actually, is it *correct* to leave the segment
value in root-> unchanged even if it is overriden) ?
Anyway, node is just used for a printk, why do not you add segment and
node to acpi_pci_root_info ? Just cosmetic stuff, trying to help you
simplify the code, it is not easy to parse.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel