[PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow dynamic mapping of physical/virtual interrupts
Christoffer Dall
christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Fri Jul 17 14:11:05 PDT 2015
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to be able to feed physical interrupts to a guest, we need
> to be able to establish the virtual-physical mapping between the two
> worlds.
>
> The mappings are kept in a set of RCU lists, indexed by virtual interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 25 +++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 1583a34..d5ce5cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
> if (ret)
> goto out_free_stage2_pgd;
>
> + kvm_vgic_init(kvm);
> kvm_timer_init(kvm);
>
> /* Mark the initial VMID generation invalid */
> @@ -249,6 +250,7 @@ out:
>
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + kvm_vgic_vcpu_postcreate(vcpu);
> }
>
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 4f9fa1d..32e57d2 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,19 @@ struct vgic_io_device {
> struct kvm_io_device dev;
> };
>
> +struct irq_phys_map {
> + u32 virt_irq;
> + u32 phys_irq;
> + u32 irq;
> + bool active;
> +};
> +
> +struct irq_phys_map_entry {
> + struct list_head entry;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> + struct irq_phys_map map;
> +};
> +
> struct vgic_dist {
> spinlock_t lock;
> bool in_kernel;
> @@ -256,6 +269,10 @@ struct vgic_dist {
> struct vgic_vm_ops vm_ops;
> struct vgic_io_device dist_iodev;
> struct vgic_io_device *redist_iodevs;
> +
> + /* Virtual irq to hwirq mapping */
> + spinlock_t irq_phys_map_lock;
> + struct list_head irq_phys_map_list;
> };
>
> struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
> @@ -307,6 +324,9 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
> struct vgic_v2_cpu_if vgic_v2;
> struct vgic_v3_cpu_if vgic_v3;
> };
> +
> + /* Protected by the distributor's irq_phys_map_lock */
> + struct list_head irq_phys_map_list;
> };
>
> #define LR_EMPTY 0xff
> @@ -321,8 +341,10 @@ int kvm_vgic_addr(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type, u64 *addr, bool write);
> int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void);
> int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm);
> int kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus(void);
> +void kvm_vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type);
> void kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_vgic_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -331,6 +353,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int irq_num,
> void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg);
> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_active_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + int virt_irq, int irq);
> +int vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct irq_phys_map *map);
should these functions not have a kvm_ prefix?
>
> #define irqchip_in_kernel(k) (!!((k)->arch.vgic.in_kernel))
> #define vgic_initialized(k) (!!((k)->arch.vgic.nr_cpus))
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 5bd1695..3424329 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> @@ -82,6 +83,8 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> static struct vgic_lr vgic_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
> static void vgic_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr, struct vgic_lr lr_desc);
> +static struct irq_phys_map *vgic_irq_map_search(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + int virt_irq);
>
> static const struct vgic_ops *vgic_ops;
> static const struct vgic_params *vgic;
> @@ -1583,6 +1586,131 @@ static irqreturn_t vgic_maintenance_handler(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static struct list_head *vgic_get_irq_phys_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + int virt_irq)
> +{
> + if (virt_irq < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
> + return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.irq_phys_map_list;
> + else
> + return &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_phys_map_list;
> +}
> +
You know what I'm going to ask you for here, but let me help out with
the framwork:
/**
* vgic_map_phys_irq - map a virtual IRQ to a physical IRQ
* @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
* @virt_irq: The virtual irq number
* @irq: The Linux IRQ number
*
*
*/
> +struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + int virt_irq, int irq)
> +{
> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> + struct list_head *root = vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct irq_phys_map *map;
> + struct irq_phys_map_entry *entry;
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_data *data;
> + int phys_irq;
> +
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> + if (!desc) {
> + kvm_err("kvm_arch_timer: can't obtain interrupt descriptor\n");
arch_timer? this is vgic code, no?
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + while (data->parent_data)
> + data = data->parent_data;
> +
> + phys_irq = data->hwirq;
> +
> + spin_lock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +
> + /* Try to match an existing mapping */
> + map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, virt_irq);
> + if (map) {
> + /* Make sure this mapping matches */
> + if (map->phys_irq != phys_irq ||
> + map->irq != irq)
when would this happen? Is this something that should gracefully just
be accepted or is it a bug?
> + map = NULL;
> +
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Create a new mapping */
> + entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
is GFP_ATOMIC really warranted here? The situatotion where you have an
existing map is extremely rare, I suppose, and is in fact an error, so
you could just pre-allocate and free on error.
> + if (!entry)
Here you seem to be returning a valid value on an error? Perhaps you
should return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) and generally use ERR_PTR/PTR_ERR here.
> + goto out;
> +
> + map = &entry->map;
> + map->virt_irq = virt_irq;
> + map->phys_irq = phys_irq;
> + map->irq = irq;
> +
> + list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->entry, root);
> +
> +out:
> + spin_unlock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> + return map;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_phys_map *vgic_irq_map_search(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + int virt_irq)
> +{
> + struct list_head *root = vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct irq_phys_map_entry *entry;
> + struct irq_phys_map *map;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, root, entry) {
> + map = &entry->map;
> + if (map->virt_irq == virt_irq) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return map;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void vgic_free_phys_irq_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> + struct irq_phys_map_entry *entry;
> +
> + entry = container_of(rcu, struct irq_phys_map_entry, rcu);
> + kfree(entry);
> +}
> +
> +int vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct irq_phys_map *map)
> +{
> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> + struct irq_phys_map_entry *entry;
> +
> + if (!map)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + entry = container_of(map, struct irq_phys_map_entry, map);
could this race with vgic_destroy_irq_phys_map, such that
vgic_destroy_irq_phys_map removes the entry from the list while we're
spinning on the lock, and then when we proceed we free the entry twice?
> +
> + spin_lock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> + list_del_rcu(&entry->entry);
> + call_rcu(&entry->rcu, vgic_free_phys_irq_map_rcu);
> + spin_unlock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vgic_destroy_irq_phys_map(struct kvm *kvm, struct list_head *root)
> +{
> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> + struct irq_phys_map_entry *entry;
> +
> + spin_lock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, root, entry) {
> + list_del_rcu(&entry->entry);
> + call_rcu(&entry->rcu, vgic_free_phys_irq_map_rcu);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +}
> +
> void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> @@ -1591,6 +1719,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kfree(vgic_cpu->active_shared);
> kfree(vgic_cpu->pend_act_shared);
> kfree(vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map);
> + vgic_destroy_irq_phys_map(vcpu->kvm, &vgic_cpu->irq_phys_map_list);
> vgic_cpu->pending_shared = NULL;
> vgic_cpu->active_shared = NULL;
> vgic_cpu->pend_act_shared = NULL;
> @@ -1627,6 +1756,12 @@ static int vgic_vcpu_init_maps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int nr_irqs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void kvm_vgic_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vgic_cpu->irq_phys_map_list);
can you do this as part of vgic_init?
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus - Get the maximum number of VCPUs allowed by HW
> *
> @@ -1664,6 +1799,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> kfree(dist->irq_spi_target);
> kfree(dist->irq_pending_on_cpu);
> kfree(dist->irq_active_on_cpu);
> + vgic_destroy_irq_phys_map(kvm, &dist->irq_phys_map_list);
> dist->irq_sgi_sources = NULL;
> dist->irq_spi_cpu = NULL;
> dist->irq_spi_target = NULL;
> @@ -1787,6 +1923,13 @@ static int init_vgic_model(struct kvm *kvm, int type)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void kvm_vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.vgic.lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.vgic.irq_phys_map_lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.vgic.irq_phys_map_list);
why can we not do this as part of kvm_vgic_create?
at least we need to think about naming here or document clearly what the
various init functions do; it is not clear what the difference between
vgic_init and kvm_vgic_init is...
> +}
> +
> int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
> {
> int i, vcpu_lock_idx = -1, ret;
> @@ -1832,7 +1975,6 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.vgic.lock);
> kvm->arch.vgic.in_kernel = true;
> kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model = type;
> kvm->arch.vgic.vctrl_base = vgic->vctrl_base;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list