[PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Dec 8 08:59:09 PST 2015
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a new case to emulate writing
> PMOVSSET or PMOVSCLR register.
>
> When writing non-zero value to PMOVSSET, pend PMU interrupt. When the
> value writing to PMOVSCLR is equal to the current value, clear the PMU
> pending interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++--
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 +++
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index c1dffb2..c830fde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -601,6 +601,15 @@ static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case PMOVSSET_EL0: {
> + if (r->CRm == 14)
> + /* accessing PMOVSSET_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, p->regval);
> + else
> + /* accessing PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(vcpu, p->regval);
> + break;
> + }
> case PMCR_EL0: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -847,7 +856,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMOVSSET_EL0 },
> /* PMSWINC_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b100),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -874,7 +883,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> trap_raz_wi },
> /* PMOVSSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b011),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMOVSSET_EL0 },
>
> /* TPIDR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1101), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b010),
> @@ -1184,6 +1193,15 @@ static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case c9_PMOVSSET: {
> + if (r->CRm == 14)
> + /* accessing c9_PMOVSSET */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, p->regval);
> + else
> + /* accessing c9_PMOVSCLR */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(vcpu, p->regval);
> + break;
> + }
> case c9_PMCR: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -1271,7 +1289,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMOVSSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMSELR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> @@ -1287,6 +1306,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> NULL, c9_PMINTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMINTENSET },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 3), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMOVSSET },
>
> { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 0), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_PRRR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 1), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_NMRR },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index e731656..a76df52 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
> u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx);
> void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable);
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx);
> #else
> @@ -50,6 +52,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx)
> }
> void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx) {}
> #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 45586d2..ba7d11c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,78 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> }
> }
>
> +static u32 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> + val = (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) >> ARMV8_PMCR_N_SHIFT)
> + & ARMV8_PMCR_N_MASK;
> + else
> + val = (vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCR) >> ARMV8_PMCR_N_SHIFT)
> + & ARMV8_PMCR_N_MASK;
Indentation? Again, no need to distinguish 32 and 64bit here.
> +
> + return GENMASK(val - 1, 0) | BIT(ARMV8_COUNTER_MASK);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_overflow_clear - clear PMU overflow interrupt
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMOVSCLR register
> + * @reg: the current value of PMOVSCLR register
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
> +
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= mask;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= ~val;
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0);
I'm not fond of messing with the sysreg like this. Consider using a
temporary variable.
> + } else {
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) &= mask;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) &= ~val;
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET);
Same here.
> + }
> +
> + /* If all overflow bits are cleared, kick the vcpu to clear interrupt
> + * pending status.
> + */
> + if (val == 0)
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
Do we really need to do so? This will be dropped on the next entry
anyway, so i don't see the need to kick the vcpu again. Or am I missing
something?
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_overflow_set - set PMU overflow interrupt
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMOVSSET register
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
> +
> + val &= mask;
> + if (val == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= mask;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= val;
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0)
> + & vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1)
> + & vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0);
Same here.
> + } else {
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) &= mask;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) |= val;
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCNTENSET)
> + & vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMINTENSET)
> + & vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET);
and here.
> + }
> +
> + if (val != 0)
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list