[PATCH] clk: sirf: add CSR atlas7 clk and reset support

Michael Turquette mturquette at linaro.org
Thu Apr 16 14:59:23 PDT 2015


Quoting Barry Song (2015-04-14 04:57:18)
> 2015-04-12 18:24 GMT+08:00, Barry Song <21cnbao at gmail.com>:
> > 2015-04-11 8:23 GMT+08:00 Michael Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>:
> >> Quoting Barry Song (2014-12-25 00:24:05)
> >>> From: Zhiwu Song <Zhiwu.Song at csr.com>
> >>>
> >>> the hardware node includes both clock and reset support, so it
> >>> is named as "car".
> >>> this patch implements Flexible clocks(mux, divider, gate), Selectable
> >>> clock(mux, divider, gate), root clock(gate),leaf clock(gate), others.
> >>> it also implements the reset controller functionality.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhiwu Song <Zhiwu.Song at csr.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song at csr.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/csr,atlas7-car.txt   |   46 +
> >>>  drivers/clk/sirf/Makefile                          |    2 +-
> >>>  drivers/clk/sirf/clk-atlas7.c                      | 1652
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  3 files changed, 1699 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>  create mode 100644
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/csr,atlas7-car.txt
> >>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sirf/clk-atlas7.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/csr,atlas7-car.txt
> >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/csr,atlas7-car.txt
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..a1a9499
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/csr,atlas7-car.txt
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> >>> +* Clock and reset bindings for CSR atlas7
> >>> +
> >>> +Required properties:
> >>> +- compatible: Should be "sirf,atlas7-car"
> >>> +- reg: Address and length of the register set
> >>> +- #clock-cells: Should be <1>
> >>> +- #reset-cells: Should be <1>
> >>> +
> >>> +The clock consumer should specify the desired clock by having the clock
> >>> +ID in its "clocks" phandle cell.
> >>> +The ID list atlas7_clks defined in drivers/clk/sirf/clk-atlas7.c
> >>> +
> >>> +The reset consumer should specify the desired reset by having the reset
> >>> +ID in its "reset" phandle cell.
> >>> +The ID list atlas7_reset_unit defined in drivers/clk/sirf/clk-atlas7.c
> >>> +
> >>> +Examples:
> >>> +
> >>> +timer at 10dc0000 {
> >>> +       compatible = "sirf,macro-tick";
> >>> +       reg = <0x10dc0000 0x1000>;
> >>> +       clocks = <&car 54>;
> >>> +       interrupts = <0 0 0>,
> >>> +                  <0 1 0>,
> >>> +                  <0 2 0>,
> >>> +                  <0 49 0>,
> >>> +                  <0 50 0>,
> >>> +                  <0 51 0>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +uart1: uart at 18020000 {
> >>> +       cell-index = <1>;
> >>> +       compatible = "sirf,macro-uart";
> >>> +       reg = <0x18020000 0x1000>;
> >>> +       clocks = <&clks 95>;
> >>> +       interrupts = <0 18 0>;
> >>> +       fifosize = <32>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +vpp at 13110000 {
> >>> +       compatible = "sirf,prima2-vpp";
> >>> +       reg = <0x13110000 0x10000>;
> >>> +       interrupts = <0 31 0>;
> >>> +       clocks = <&car 85>;
> >>> +       resets = <&car 29>;
> >>> +};
> >>
> >> It would be nice to provide an example of the clock provider node,
> >> "sirf,atlas7-car".
> >
> > ok. Mike, thanks for reviewing.
> 
> hi mike,  the example of the clock provider node has been done by the
> v2 patch sent two days ago.is there enough time to push it to 4.1?

I'm afraid not. I'll take it after 4.1-rc1 drops.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> >
> >> Also do you have a patch which adds this node to a
> >> dts file somewhere?
> >>
> >
> > this has been done when atlas7 platform was added. see:
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/atlas7.dtsi
> >
> > there is a node:
> >             car: clock-controller at 18620000 {
> >                 compatible = "sirf,atlas7-car";
> >                 reg = <0x18620000 0x1000>;
> >                 #clock-cells = <1>;
> >                 #reset-cells = <1>;
> >             };
> >
> >> Otherwise the rest of this patch looks OK.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Mike
> >
> > -barry
> >
> 
> -barry



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list