[PATCH v2] arm64: ARM: Fix the Generic Timers interrupt active level description

Jisheng Zhang jszhang at marvell.com
Thu Nov 27 19:12:52 PST 2014


Dear Marc and Liviu,

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:39:28 -0800
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com> wrote:

> On 27/11/14 16:21, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > The Cortex-A5x TRM states in paragraph "9.2 Generic Timer functional
> > description" that generic timers provide a level not edge interrupt
> > output. Fix the device trees to correctly describe this.
> > 
> > While doing this update the CPU mask to match the number of described
> > CPUs as well as the DT bindings documentation for Generic Timers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau at arm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> 
> 	M.
> 
> > ---
> > 
> > Arnd, Olof: This is on top of linux-next/master as it patches Juno's
> > as well as all the other ARM DTs.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 8 ++++----
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts            | 8 ++++----
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts                     | 8 ++++----
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts           | 8 ++++----
> >  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt index
> > 37b2caf..6d2aa87 100644 ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt @@ -27,10 +27,10
> > @@ Example: timer {
> >  		compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-timer",
> >  			     "arm,armv7-timer";
> > -		interrupts = <1 13 0xf08>,
> > -			     <1 14 0xf08>,
> > -			     <1 11 0xf08>,
> > -			     <1 10 0xf08>;
> > +		interrupts = <1 13 0xf04>,
> > +			     <1 14 0xf04>,
> > +			     <1 11 0xf04>,
> > +			     <1 10 0xf04>;
> >  		clock-frequency = <100000000>;
> >  	};
> >  

Does it mean we also need to fix the interrupt level description under
arch/arm/boot/dts? I found they are also wrong or I misunderstand something?

Thanks,
Jisheng



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list