[PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: s3c2410: Handle i2c sys_cfg register in i2c driver
kgene at kernel.org
Fri Nov 21 16:42:43 PST 2014
Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2014 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> >> Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will
> >> help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and
> >> will help in removing static iomapping of SYS register in exynos.c
> >> Since only Exynos5250, and Exynos5420 has i2c nodes in DT, added syscon
> >> based phandle to i2c device nodes of respective SoC DT files.
Well...actually there are 4ch i2c in exynos5410 and exynos5800 as well, i2c
nodes are not added in dt files though.
> >> Also handle saving and restoring of SYS_I2C_CFG register during
> >> suspend and resume of i2c driver.
> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> >> CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
> >> CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa at the-dreams.de>
> >> CC: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> >> CC: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> >> CC: linux-doc at vger.kernel.org
> >> CC: linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-s3c2410.txt | 1 +
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 4 +++
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 4 +++
> > I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say
> > so if there are reasons I should take them.
> I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver.
> I am not very sure via which tree this should go. May be I can ask
> samsung SoC maintainer Kukjin to look into this, as patch 2/2 has
> changes in mach-exynos which should go via Kukjin's tree.
I'll reply on other email.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel