[PATCH v3 2/5] drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver

Russell King - ARM Linux linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Nov 20 02:03:29 PST 2014


On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:09:25AM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> index 063113d..44d220d 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)		+= qcom/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA)	+= tegra/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_TI)		+= ti/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_VERSATILE)	+= versatile/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= samsung/

Is ARCH_EXYNOS appropriate here, or is your new SOC_SAMSUNG better?

> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a424ebc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +#
> +# SAMSUNG SOC drivers
> +#
> +menuconfig SOC_SAMSUNG
> +	bool "Samsung SOC drivers support"

If you intend to select SOC_SAMSUNG, is there any point in making this
a user-visible symbol?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list