[RFC PATCH] drivers: of: move PCI domain assignment to generic OF code

Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Mon Nov 10 05:52:32 PST 2014


On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:51:19PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2014 12:26:08 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 14 +++--------
> >  drivers/of/of_pci.c     | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/of_pci.h  |  7 +++---
> >  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > index ce5836c..5e21c1c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > @@ -49,20 +49,14 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
> > -static bool dt_domain_found = false;
> >  
> >  void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
> >  {
> > -	int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
> > +	int domain = of_assign_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
> >  
> > -	if (domain >= 0) {
> > -		dt_domain_found = true;
> > -	} else if (dt_domain_found == true) {
> > -		dev_err(parent, "Node %s is missing \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n",
> > -			parent->of_node->full_name);
> > -		return;
> > -	} else {
> > -		domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr();
> > +	if (domain < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(parent, "PCI domain assignment failed\n");
> > +		domain = -1;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	bus->domain_nr = domain;
> 
> Is there a need to still keep this in architecture specific code? Why
> not move it to drivers/pci and let other firmware infrastructure
> hook in there directly.

Ok, I can move the function to drivers/pci/pci.c, I did not want to add
OF code in there but if it is ok with Bjorn I will move the generic

pci_bus_assign_domain_nr()

there and be done with this.

> >  {
> > @@ -45,10 +45,9 @@ of_pci_parse_bus_range(struct device_node *node, struct resource *res)
> >  	return -EINVAL;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline int
> > -of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node)
> > +static inline int of_assign_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node)
> >  {
> > -	return -1;
> > +	return pci_get_new_domain_nr();
> >  }
> >  #endif
> 
> This gets a bit tricky otherwise once we add ACPI in the mix, with all
> combinations of OF and ACPI at compile time and at runtime.

I definitely agree, that's why it is an RFC, basically wanted to
understand what we want to do with the generic implementation and where
to move it.

Thanks,
Lorenzo



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list