[Patch Part2 v4 18/31] PCI/MSI, trivial: Fix minor syntax issues according to coding styles

Bjorn Helgaas bhelgaas at google.com
Wed Nov 5 14:10:01 PST 2014


On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:01:52PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at linux.intel.com>

Needs a changelog, even if it's similar to the topic.

Speaking of the topic, please run "git log --oneline drivers/pci/msi.c" and
make yours look similar to the others.  This doesn't really fix a syntax
issue; the existing code is syntactically correct.  It's only a style
issue.

I'd say something like:

  PCI/MSI: Remove unnecessary braces around single statements

  Per Documentation/CodingStyle, don't use braces around single statements.

> ---
>  drivers/pci/msi.c |    9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 9fab30af0e75..fb2ccb536324 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -244,9 +244,8 @@ void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct msi_desc *entry;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list)
>  		default_restore_msi_irq(dev, entry->irq);
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  void __read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
> @@ -451,9 +450,8 @@ static void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  				PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
>  
>  	arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
> -	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list)
>  		msix_mask_irq(entry, entry->masked);
> -	}
>  
>  	msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL, 0);
>  }
> @@ -497,9 +495,8 @@ static int populate_msi_sysfs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	int count = 0;
>  
>  	/* Determine how many msi entries we have */
> -	list_for_each_entry(entry, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(entry, &pdev->msi_list, list)
>  		++num_msi;
> -	}
>  	if (!num_msi)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list