[PATCH v3 09/47] mfd: palmas: Register with kernel power-off handler
linux at roeck-us.net
Mon Nov 3 10:36:53 PST 2014
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> > > directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
> > > only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
> > >
> > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > > - Replace poweroff in all newly introduced variables and in text
> > > with power_off or power-off as appropriate
> > > - Replace POWEROFF_PRIORITY_xxx with POWER_OFF_PRIORITY_xxx
> > > v2:
> > > - Use define to specify poweroff handler priority
> > > - Use devm_register_power_off_handler
> > > - Use dev_warn instead of dev_err
> > >
> > > drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > include/linux/mfd/palmas.h | 3 +++
> > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> missed lakml and linux-omap.
unfortunately, get_maintainer.pl doesn't give a hint that this and the
other affected patches should be sent to linux-omap. How am I supposed
to know ?
Note that linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org was copied on the entire series,
if that is what you mean with lakml. linux-pm at vger.kernel.org was also
copied on all patches. Additional mailing lists were only copied for
affected architectures to avoid for the patches to be tagged as spam.
If there is a list named lakml, I must have missed it, and I seem to be
unable to find a reference to it. If that is the case, my apologies,
and please provide a link to it.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel