[PATCH 1/8] mmc: sdhci-st: Intial support for ST SDHCI controller

[Peter Griffin]

Hi Srini,

Thanks for reviewing, see my comments below: -

On Fri, 23 May 2014, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:

> >+struct st_mmc_platform_data {
> >+	struct  reset_control	*rstc;
> >+};
> 
> st_mmc_platform_data name is bit missleading as this data is not
> part of platform data. Probably you could rename it to struct
> sdhci_st_data.

I've now removed this reset controller code for v2, as based on Maxime's feedback
I think this would be better off going in the generic code, so all 
platforms could benefit if they have a reset controller implementation.

I plan to send some RFC patches which implement this seperately to this series.

> >+	pltfm_host->priv = pdata;
> >+
> >+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host);
> 
> Why not platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv_host);
> As you are not using sdhci_host directly, this will reduced few
> indirections in the driver.

Your right, and I was going to change this, but with the re-think on the reset
controller code above I will now need sdhci_host so would prefer to leave it as
is for now.

> >+err_out:
> >+	clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> >+	sdhci_pltfm_free(pdev);
> >+
> IP could be left out of reset in this path.

Good spot, I'll remember this when I add the reset code
back in :-)

> 
> replace:
> [...
> >+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sdhci_st_pmops, sdhci_st_suspend, sdhci_st_resume);
> >+#define SDHCI_ST_PMOPS (&sdhci_st_pmops)
> >+#else
> >+#define SDHCI_ST_PMOPS NULL
> >+#endif
> ...]
> 
> with :
> 
> #endif
> 
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sdhci_st_pmops, sdhci_st_suspend, sdhci_st_resume);

Fixed in v2

regards,

Peter.