[PATCH v2 4/7] dma: of: introduce of_dma_is_coherent() helper

Arnd Bergmann arnd at arndb.de
Fri Feb 28 10:24:56 EST 2014


On Friday 28 February 2014 09:14:19 Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> I know Will D was not a fan of this property. Primarily I believe
> because you may need to describe more than just a boolean in more
> complex bus topologies.

I can't think of any example where it's not per-device. Do you
think we can end up with a device that has multiple bus master
ports, only some of which are coherent, or is there a different
concern?

> Effectively, highbank is always coherent. It was only PCI that is
> non-coherent, but I can safely say PCI will never be enabled at this
> point. There are no designs with PCI beyond 1 or 2 validation boards
> (total boards, not designs), and getting PCI to work was quite hacky
> due to only a 1MB window. The other masters are programmable, but only
> the coherent path is used as the non-coherent path actually has some
> issues. I had expected the opposite believing the ACP port would
> actually have issues which is also why I made it configurable.

Ok, I see. I still expect that we will see systems that are only
partially coherent in the future, but it's good to know we don't really
have to deal with backwards-compatibility as long as we can just
hardcode highbank to be always coherent.

I'm especially thankful we don't have to deal with the PCI implementation.

	Arnd



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list