[PATCH 03/18] arm64: boot protocol documentation update for GICv3

[Marc Zyngier]

On 25/02/14 18:06, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Linux has some requirements that must be satisfied in order to boot
>> on a system built with a GICv3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/arm64/booting.txt | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
>> index a9691cc..4a02ebd 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
>> @@ -131,6 +131,13 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
>>    the kernel image will be entered must be initialised by software at a
>>    higher exception level to prevent execution in an UNKNOWN state.
>>  
>> +  For systems with a GICv3 interrupt controller, it is expected that:
>> +  - ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.GIC (bits [27:24]) must have the value 0b0001
> 
> Since ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 is read-only at all exception levels, I don't see the
> value of this statement.

Think virtualization. A hypervisor can control reads of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1
by setting HCR_EL2.TID3, and report whatever it wants.

>> +  - If EL3 is present, it must program ICC_SRE_EL3.Enable (bit 3) to
>> +    0b1 and ICC_SRE_EL3.SRE (bit 0) to 0b1.
>> +  - If the kernel is entered at EL1, EL2 must set ICC_SRE_EL2.Enable
>> +    (bit 3) to 0b1 and ICC_SRE_EL2.SRE (bit 0) to 0b1.
> 
> Does this force the kernel to use SRE?

No. The kernel still have to explicitly set ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE to 1.

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...