[PATCH 5/6] ARM: mvebu: Add thermal quirk for the Armada 375 DB board

Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 08:59:05 PDT 2014


On 04/16/2014 04:15 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> The initial release of the Armada 375 DB board has an Armada 375
> Z1 stepping silicon. This commit introduces a quirk that allows
> to workaround a series of issues with the thermal sensor in this
> stepping, but updating the devicetree:
>
>    * Updates the compatible string for the thermal, so the driver
>      can perform a specific initialization of the sensor.
>
>    * Moves the offset of the thermal control register. This quirk
>      allows to specifiy the correct (A0 stepping) offset in the
>      devicetree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c     | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.h |  3 ++
>   2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
> index 333fca8..93f50f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
> @@ -96,10 +96,66 @@ static void __init i2c_quirk(void)
>   	return;
>   }
>
> +#define A375_Z1_THERMAL_FIXUP_OFFSET 0xc
> +
> +static void __init thermal_quirk(void)

Are we sure, we want to fixup quirks like this the way below?

Alternatively, we can also keep some armada-375-z1.dtsi and one
for the board including it.

Sebastian

> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	u32 dev, rev;
> +
> +	if (mvebu_get_soc_id(&dev, &rev) && rev > ARMADA_375_Z1_REV)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "marvell,armada375-thermal") {
> +		struct property *prop;
> +		__be32 newval, *newprop, *oldprop;
> +		int len;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The register offset is at a wrong location. This quirk
> +		 * creates a new reg property as a clone of the previous
> +		 * one and corrects the offset.
> +		 */
> +		oldprop = (__be32 *)of_get_property(np, "reg", &len);
> +		if (!oldprop)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Create a duplicate of the 'reg' property */
> +		prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		prop->length = len;
> +		prop->name = kstrdup("reg", GFP_KERNEL);
> +		prop->value = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		memcpy(prop->value, oldprop, len);
> +
> +		/* Fixup the register offset of the second entry */
> +		oldprop += 2;
> +		newprop = (__be32 *)prop->value + 2;
> +		newval = cpu_to_be32(be32_to_cpu(*oldprop) -
> +				     A375_Z1_THERMAL_FIXUP_OFFSET);
> +		*newprop = newval;
> +		of_update_property(np, prop);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The thermal controller needs some quirk too, so let's change
> +		 * the compatible string to reflect this.
> +		 */
> +		prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		prop->name = kstrdup("compatible", GFP_KERNEL);
> +		prop->length = sizeof("marvell,armada375-z1-thermal");
> +		prop->value = kstrdup("marvell,armada375-z1-thermal",
> +						GFP_KERNEL);
> +		of_update_property(np, prop);
> +	}
> +	return;
> +}
> +
>   static void __init mvebu_dt_init(void)
>   {
>   	if (of_machine_is_compatible("plathome,openblocks-ax3-4"))
>   		i2c_quirk();
> +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,a375-db"))
> +		thermal_quirk();
> +
>   	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
>   }
>
> @@ -123,6 +179,7 @@ static const char * const armada_375_dt_compat[] = {
>
>   DT_MACHINE_START(ARMADA_375_DT, "Marvell Armada 375 (Device Tree)")
>   	.init_time	= mvebu_timer_and_clk_init,
> +	.init_machine	= mvebu_dt_init,
>   	.restart	= mvebu_restart,
>   	.dt_compat	= armada_375_dt_compat,
>   MACHINE_END
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.h b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.h
> index 3165425..294a443 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
>   #define MV78XX0_A0_REV	    0x1
>   #define MV78XX0_B0_REV	    0x2
>
> +/* Armada 375 */
> +#define ARMADA_375_Z1_REV   0x0
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU
>   int mvebu_get_soc_id(u32 *dev, u32 *rev);
>   #else
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list