[PATCH 4/8] sdhci: sdhci-esdhci-imx: add sd3.0 clock tuning support
Dong Aisheng
dongas86 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 5 11:02:42 EDT 2013
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Nothing major, only a few nitpicks.
>
Thanks for the careful review.
Will address them all in next version.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:54:13PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > Freescale i.MX6Q/DL uSDHC clock tuning progress is a little different from
> > the standard tuning process defined in host controller spec v3.0.
> > Thus we use platform_execute_tuning instead of standard sdhci tuning.
> >
> > The main difference are:
> > 1) not only generate Buffer Read Ready interrupt when tuning is performing.
> > It generates all other DATA interrupts like the normal data command.
> > 2) SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING is not automatically cleared by HW,
> > instead it's controlled by SW.
> > 3) SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK is not automatically set by HW,
> > it's controlled by SW.
> > 4) the clock delay for every tuning is set by SW.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396 at freescale.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > index 3118a82..36b9f63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > @@ -34,9 +34,21 @@
> > #define ESDHC_WTMK_LVL 0x44
> > #define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL 0x48
> > #define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_AC23EN (1 << 7)
> > +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE (1 << 22)
> > +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL (1 << 23)
> > +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_AUTO_TUNE (1 << 24)
>
> It seems unused?
>
> > +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL (1 << 25)
> > /* Bits 3 and 6 are not SDHCI standard definitions */
> > #define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SDHCI_MASK 0xb7
> >
> > +/* tune control register */
> > +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS 0x68
> > +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP 1
> > +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MIN 0
> > +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MAX ((1 << 7) - 1)
> > +
> > +#define ESDHC_TUNING_BLOCK_PATTERN_LEN 64
> > +
> > /*
> > * Our interpretation of the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL register
> > */
> > @@ -87,7 +99,7 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data {
> > MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS, /* exact multiblock cmd in process */
> > WAIT_FOR_INT, /* sent CMD12, waiting for response INT */
> > } multiblock_status;
> > -
> > + u32 uhs_mode;
> > };
> >
> > static struct platform_device_id imx_esdhc_devtype[] = {
> > @@ -161,6 +173,17 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> > struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> > u32 val = readl(host->ioaddr + reg);
> >
> > + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE)) {
> > + u32 fsl_prss = val;
> > + val = 0;
> > + /* save the least 20 bits */
> > + val |= fsl_prss & 0x000FFFFF;
>
> Nit: you can do the following to save one assignment, right?
>
> val = fsl_prss & 0x000FFFFF;
>
> > + /* move dat[0-3] bits */
> > + val |= (fsl_prss & 0x0F000000) >> 4;
> > + /* move cmd line bit */
> > + val |= (fsl_prss & 0x00800000) << 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES)) {
> > /* In FSL esdhc IC module, only bit20 is used to indicate the
> > * ADMA2 capability of esdhc, but this bit is messed up on
> > @@ -175,6 +198,17 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1) && is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data))
> > + val = SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104
> > + | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT) && is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> > + val = 0;
> > + val |= 0xFF << SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT_330_SHIFT;
> > + val |= 0xFF << SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT_300_SHIFT;
> > + val |= 0xFF << SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT_180_SHIFT;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_INT_STATUS)) {
> > if (val & ESDHC_INT_VENDOR_SPEC_DMA_ERR) {
> > val &= ~ESDHC_INT_VENDOR_SPEC_DMA_ERR;
> > @@ -253,6 +287,8 @@ static u16 esdhc_readw_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> > {
> > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> > + u16 ret = 0;
> > + u32 val;
> >
> > if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_HOST_VERSION)) {
> > reg ^= 2;
> > @@ -265,6 +301,25 @@ static u16 esdhc_readw_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2)) {
> > + val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> > + if (val & ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_VSELECT)
> > + ret |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180;
> > +
> > + if (is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> > + val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > + if (val & ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE)
> > + ret |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> > + if (val & ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL)
> > + ret |= SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret |= (imx_data->uhs_mode & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK);
> > + ret &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > return readw(host->ioaddr + reg);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -272,8 +327,32 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
> > {
> > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> > + u32 new_val = 0;
> >
> > switch (reg) {
> > + case SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL:
> > + new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> > + if (val & SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN)
> > + new_val |= ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON;
> > + else
> > + new_val &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON;
> > + writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> > + return;
> > + case SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2:
> > + new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> > + if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180)
> > + new_val |= ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_VSELECT;
> > + else
> > + new_val &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_VSELECT;
> > + writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> > + imx_data->uhs_mode = val & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK;
> > + new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > + if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)
> > + new_val |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> > + else
> > + new_val &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> > + writel(new_val , host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > + return;
> > case SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE:
> > if ((imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT)
> > && (host->cmd->opcode == SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED)
> > @@ -451,6 +530,118 @@ static int esdhc_pltfm_bus_width(struct sdhci_host *host, int width)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void esdhc_prepare_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > + reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL |
> > + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> > + writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > + writel((val << 8), host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
>
> Nit: unnecessary parentheses around val << 8
>
> > + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> > + "tunning with delay 0x%x ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS 0x%x\n",
> > + val, readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void request_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
>
> s/request_done/esdhc_request_done to have proper namespace.
>
> > +{
> > + complete(&mrq->completion);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> > +{
> > + struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
> > + struct mmc_request mrq = {0};
> > + struct mmc_data data = {0};
> > + struct scatterlist sg;
> > + char tuning_pattern[ESDHC_TUNING_BLOCK_PATTERN_LEN];
> > +
> > + cmd.opcode = opcode;
> > + cmd.arg = 0;
> > + cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> > +
> > + data.blksz = ESDHC_TUNING_BLOCK_PATTERN_LEN;
> > + data.blocks = 1;
> > + data.flags = MMC_DATA_READ;
> > + data.sg = &sg;
> > + data.sg_len = 1;
> > +
> > + sg_init_one(&sg, tuning_pattern, sizeof(tuning_pattern));
> > +
> > + mrq.cmd = &cmd;
> > + mrq.cmd->mrq = &mrq;
> > + mrq.data = &data;
> > + mrq.data->mrq = &mrq;
> > + mrq.cmd->data = mrq.data;
> > +
> > + mrq.done = request_done;
> > + init_completion(&(mrq.completion));
> > +
> > + disable_irq(host->irq);
> > + spin_lock(&host->lock);
> > + host->mrq = &mrq;
> > +
> > + sdhci_send_command(host, mrq.cmd);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> > + enable_irq(host->irq);
> > +
> > + wait_for_completion(&mrq.completion);
> > +
> > + if (cmd.error)
> > + return cmd.error;
> > + if (data.error)
> > + return data.error;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void esdhc_post_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > +{
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > + reg &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> > + writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int esdhc_executing_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> > +{
> > + int min, max, avg, ret;
> > +
> > + /* find the mininum delay first which can pass tuning*/
>
> Nit: put a space before */
>
> > + min = ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MIN;
> > + while (min < ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MAX) {
> > + esdhc_prepare_tuning(host, min);
> > + if (!esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(host, opcode))
> > + break;
> > + min += ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* find the maxinum delay which can not pass tuning*/
>
> Ditto
>
> Shawn
>
> > + max = min + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> > + while (max < ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MAX) {
> > + esdhc_prepare_tuning(host, max);
> > + if (esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(host, opcode)) {
> > + max -= ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + max += ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* use average delay to get the best timing */
> > + avg = (min + max) / 2;
> > + esdhc_prepare_tuning(host, avg);
> > + ret = esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(host, opcode);
> > + esdhc_post_tuning(host);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "tunning %s at 0x%x ret %d\n",
> > + ret ? "failed" : "passed", avg, ret);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> > .read_l = esdhc_readl_le,
> > .read_w = esdhc_readw_le,
> > @@ -462,6 +653,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> > .get_min_clock = esdhc_pltfm_get_min_clock,
> > .get_ro = esdhc_pltfm_get_ro,
> > .platform_bus_width = esdhc_pltfm_bus_width,
> > + .platform_execute_tuning = esdhc_executing_tuning,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata = {
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list