[Ksummit-2013-discuss] [RFC] of: Allow for experimental device tree bindings

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Wed Oct 23 13:05:16 EDT 2013


On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 09:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> So to avoid tainting the kernel and clogging the kernel log I'll have
> to remove all the "!" from the dt sources, or not use any "!" in the
> dt bindings in the first place. Given that, not sure if anyone will
> really use this mechanism. And CONFIG_OF_EXPERIMENTAL/CONFIG_UNSTABLE_DT
> might have the same ultimate fate as CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.

It's not as if it's hard for you to patch out the check if you really
want to do that. This is about making it clear to people what they
should expect if they use staging code/bindings. 

-- 
dwmw2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5745 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131023/68b4ec33/attachment.bin>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list