[PATCH 5/5] ARM: vexpress/TC2: register vexpress-spc cpufreq device

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:

> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha at arm.com>
> 
> This patch adds vexpress-spc platform device to enables the vexpress
> SPC cpufreq interface driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha at arm.com>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll at arm.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> index a8b8310..4ddfbfe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/opp.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>  
> @@ -532,6 +533,7 @@ static int __init ve_spc_clk_init(void)
>  			pr_warn("failed to initialise cpu%d opp table\n", cpu);
>  	}
>  
> +	platform_device_register_simple("vexpress-spc-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  module_init(ve_spc_clk_init);

OK... this solves my concern about initcall ordering.  Please just 
disregard my suggestions on patch #3.  I'd suggest folding this patch 
into patch 3/5 though.


Nicolas