[RESEND PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Move arm core power down clock to exynos5250 common clock

Amit Kachhap amit.kachhap at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 00:27:45 EDT 2013


Hi Bartlomeij,

Yes these patches have missed 2 merge windows and still not merged.

Mike:
I am re-basing these patches on linux-next. Please merge them.

Regards,
Amit

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie at samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Mike:
>
> Could you please apply this patch? It is few months overdue..
>
> Amit:
>
> This patch no longer applies to -next. Could you please refresh and resend it?
>
> You can add:
>
>         Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>
>
> while at it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
> On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:22:44 AM amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Please merge this patch as it is pending since last merge window.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amit
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>> > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Now with common clock support added for exynos5250 it is necessary to move
>> >> this code to exynos5250 common clock driver as clock registers should be
>> >> handled there. This change is tested in exynos5250 based arndale platform.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan at samsung.com>
>> >> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham at linaro.org>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel at samsung.com>
>> >
>> > Hmm...I'm not sure it's better to handle the ARM core power down clock in
>> > common clock but the clock registers should be handled in one part, clock.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsugn.com>
>> >
>> > Mike, the mach-exynos/cpuidle.c is not touched in samsung tree at this
>> > moment, so this patch will not create any conflict between samsung and clk.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > - Kukjin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie at samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Mike:
>
> Could you please apply this patch? It is few months overdue..
>
> Amit:
>
> This patch no longer applies to -next. Could you please refresh and resend it?
>
> You can add:
>
>         Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>
>
> while at it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
> On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:22:44 AM amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Please merge this patch as it is pending since last merge window.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amit
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>> > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Now with common clock support added for exynos5250 it is necessary to move
>> >> this code to exynos5250 common clock driver as clock registers should be
>> >> handled there. This change is tested in exynos5250 based arndale platform.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan at samsung.com>
>> >> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham at linaro.org>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel at samsung.com>
>> >
>> > Hmm...I'm not sure it's better to handle the ARM core power down clock in
>> > common clock but the clock registers should be handled in one part, clock.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsugn.com>
>> >
>> > Mike, the mach-exynos/cpuidle.c is not touched in samsung tree at this
>> > moment, so this patch will not create any conflict between samsung and clk.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > - Kukjin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list