[PATCH 1/1] irq-gic: add capability to set bypass flag in GIC
Anup Patel
anup at brainfault.org
Sat Nov 23 03:45:05 EST 2013
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com> wrote:
>> [dropping <patches at apm.com> from the CC list, as someone seems to have
>> tripped on the config file, and I'm tired of getting bounces]
>>
>> Feng,
>>
>> On 19/11/13 21:42, Feng Kan wrote:
>>> The GIC-400 implementation allows for FIQ and IRQ bypass. In the
>>> X-Gene implementation, the FIQ bypass must be enabled at all time.
>>> Otherwise, some PPI will appear as FIQ and cause kernel problem.
>>
>> How comes? Are only PPIs affected? When you say "some PPIs", can you be
>> more specific?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan at apm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h | 4 ++--
>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>>> index d0e9480..aa7342e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>>> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
>>> #endif
>>> struct irq_domain *domain;
>>> unsigned int gic_irqs;
>>> + unsigned int bypass_flag;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
>>> void __iomem *(*get_base)(union gic_base *);
>>> #endif
>>> @@ -450,7 +451,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>>> writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
>>>
>>> writel_relaxed(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
>>> - writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
>>> + writel_relaxed(gic->bypass_flag | 1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void gic_cpu_if_down(void)
>>> @@ -591,7 +592,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
>>> writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
>>>
>>> writel_relaxed(0xf0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
>>> - writel_relaxed(1, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
>>> + writel_relaxed(gic_data[gic_nr].bypass_flag | 1, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int gic_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v)
>>> @@ -733,7 +734,8 @@ const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
>>>
>>> void __init gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
>>> void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base,
>>> - u32 percpu_offset, struct device_node *node)
>>> + u32 percpu_offset, u32 bypass_val,
>>> + struct device_node *node)
>>> {
>>> irq_hw_number_t hwirq_base;
>>> struct gic_chip_data *gic;
>>> @@ -821,6 +823,7 @@ void __init gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
>>>
>>> set_handle_irq(gic_handle_irq);
>>>
>>> + gic->bypass_flag = (bypass_val & 0xf) << 4;
>>
>> Beware, the top 2 bits are reserved on GICv1, and shouldn't be messed with.
>>
>>> gic_chip.flags |= gic_arch_extn.flags;
>>> gic_dist_init(gic);
>>> gic_cpu_init(gic);
>>> @@ -835,6 +838,7 @@ int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>>> void __iomem *cpu_base;
>>> void __iomem *dist_base;
>>> u32 percpu_offset;
>>> + u32 bypass_val;
>>> int irq;
>>>
>>> if (WARN_ON(!node))
>>> @@ -849,7 +853,10 @@ int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>>> if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpu-offset", &percpu_offset))
>>> percpu_offset = 0;
>>>
>>> - gic_init_bases(gic_cnt, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, percpu_offset, node);
>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "bypass-flags", &bypass_val))
>>> + bypass_val = 0;
>>
>> [adding Mark on Cc, so he can comment on the DT parts]
>>
>> Where's the DT documentation update? Also, as this is an
>> implementation-specific quirk, you should consider using a separate
>> compatible string and move the handling of this issue into some X-Gene
>> specific code.
>
> Adding separate compatible string for X-Gene specific GIC will break
> VGIC code for X-Gene because VGIC code looks for DT node compatible
> to "arm,cortex-a15-gic". We don't want to break currently working VGIC
> code for X-Gene.
>
> The Legacy-IRQ bypass disable and Legacy-FIQ bypass disable is a
> feature of GIC-400 and its not X-Gene specific. The only difference in X-Gene
> is that we use PPI31 (Legacy-IRQ) for timer and PPI28 (Legacy-FIQ) for perf
> event. The issue is that IRQBypDisGrp0, FIQBypDisGrp0, IRQBypDisGrp1
> and FIQBypDisGrp1 bits are 0 by default and for X-Gene we need to set
> these bits to 1 so that GIC-400 does not bypass PPI31 (Legacy-IRQ) and
> PPI28 (Legacy-FIQ).
>
> We should have more cleaner and optional device tree binding for GIC
> which can help us set IRQBypDisGrp0, FIQBypDisGrp0, IRQBypDisGrp1
> and FIQBypDisGrp1 bits for X-Gene.
>
> Regards,
> Anup
Adding Kumar Sankaran.
>
>>
>>> + gic_init_bases(gic_cnt, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, percpu_offset, bypass_val, node);
>>>
>>> if (parent) {
>>> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>>> index 0e5d9ec..999515b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>>> @@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ struct device_node;
>>> extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
>>>
>>> void gic_init_bases(unsigned int, int, void __iomem *, void __iomem *,
>>> - u32 offset, struct device_node *);
>>> + u32 offset, u32 bypass_val, struct device_node *);
>>> void gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq);
>>> void gic_cpu_if_down(void);
>>>
>>> static inline void gic_init(unsigned int nr, int start,
>>> void __iomem *dist , void __iomem *cpu)
>>> {
>>> - gic_init_bases(nr, start, dist, cpu, 0, NULL);
>>> + gic_init_bases(nr, start, dist, cpu, 0, 0, NULL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY */
>>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> M.
>> --
>> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list