[PATCH v2 00/14] Marvell EBU thermal sensor consolidation

Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 09:58:17 EDT 2013


On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:23:32PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
>> <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:30:01AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> >> I've not a strong opinion, but i think separate drivers are better.
>> >
>> > Don't you think a single driver could make maintenance cheaper?
>>
>> Ezequiel, Andrew,
>>
>> just to sum up my opinion on the whole discussion
>>
>
> Thanks for jumping in.
>
>> +1 for formula fixes for kirkwood and dove
>
> Could you test the Dove formula fixes and provide a Tested-by?
> However little the patches maybe, it still makes me nervous
> to send untested patches.

Well, I cannot "test" if temperature values are correct but at least
returned values look reasonable. I suggest to trust Marvell engineers here.

Sebastian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list