[PATCH] ARM: dts: i.MX27: Add Secondary AHB Port definitions

[Shawn Guo]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:08:10PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Introducing primary bus will produce a completely different i.MX27 DTS,
> since it contain AIPI1,2 and iram.

That's one reason I would stay away from the change, because if the
addition of Secondary AHB is accepted, it will be a little more
difficult for us to say NO to people who love to have Primary AHB added.

> Introduction of buses has no effect, other than the possibility of using labels
> and minimal validation of nodes to the correct address.

Only if there is no code in the kernel searching a node via node path.

> In this case, I define the bus here for the subsequent addition of WEIM,
> for a better understanding of what and where is.
> Of course we can do without it. Think is it unnecessary?

Great, please do without it then, thanks.

Shawn