[GIT PULL] ux500 <mach/id.h> removal

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Tue Feb 5 17:22:47 EST 2013


Hi,

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>
>> Unrelated to this: The mach/id.h removal seems to have caused a few
>> build errors in the for-next tree with u8500_defconfig. Can you have
>> a look at what went wrong there?
>
> Yes ... hm.
>
> I have no clue how this happened, somehow new dependencues
> have appeared and I've somehow had a config that builds without
> some of the drivers or something :-(
>
> Or I built the wrong branch and thought it was clear to go.
>
> Shall we just drop it until I've fixed it up?

What's the expected timeline for fixup? I can revert the patch in
for-next and we can take a fix on top of the branch that introduced
the breakage, if that's easier.


-Olof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list