[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: add power domains support for EXYNOS5440
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
b.zolnierkie at samsung.com
Tue Aug 6 12:16:56 EDT 2013
Hi,
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 09:14:11 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:01:52PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > (CCing the other DT maintainers, hence quoting binding in full)
> >
> > On 08/02/2013 07:23 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On EXYNOS5440 power domains are handled in a different way than on
> > > the previous EXYNOS SoCs. Add support for them to EXYNOS pm_domains
> > > driver. Then add device tree nodes for PCIe (controlling power for
> > > PCIe host controller) and Conn2 (controlling power for Ethernet,
> > > SATA and USB controllers) power domains to exynos5440.dtsi.
> > >
> > > Currently if runtime Power Management is enabled and the driver
> > > for devices under power domain is disabled then the power domain
> > > will be disabled by EXYNOS pm_domains driver. To make more active
> > > use of power domains (dynamically enable and disabled them as
> > > needed) it is required to add runtime PM support to pci-exynos,
> > > stmmac, ahci_platform, ohci-exynos and ehci-s5p drivers (to be
> > > done later).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham at samsung.com>
> > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
> > > Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt | 33 ++
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 23 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 4
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c | 138 +++++++++-
> > > 5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt 2013-08-02 14:45:53.551392396 +0200
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt 2013-08-02 14:46:29.799391845 +0200
> > > @@ -5,20 +5,47 @@ to gate power to one or more peripherals
> > >
> > > Required Properties:
> > > - compatible: should be one of the following.
> > > - * samsung,exynos4210-pd - for exynos4210 type power domain.
> > > + * samsung,exynos4210-pd - for Exynos4210 type power domain.
> > > + * samsung,exynos5440-pd - for Exynos5440 type power domain.
> > > - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> > > - region.
> > > + region (Exynos4210 type power domain) or bit offset in the control
> > > + register (Exynos5440 type power domain).
> > > +
> > > +Additional parent node must be created for Exynos5440 power domains with
> > > +the following required properties:
> > > +- compatible: samsung,exynos5440-power-domains, simple-bus
> > > +- reg: physical base address of the XMU controller and length of memory
> > > + mapped region
> >
> > It's a little odd to describe the child nodes first. Given the 4210 and
> > 5440 bindings work so differently, I'd suggest making separate binding
> > files for the two; samsung,exynos4210-pd.txt and samsung,exynos5440-pd.txt.
OK, I'll fix it.
> > The node being describe here clearly is not a simple-bus; the child
> > nodes appear to have a specific need that their parent be compatible =
> > "samsung,exynos5440-power-domains", hence they aren't the independent
> > devices that simple-bus would usually contain.
>
> +1. This is most definitely not a simple-bus, the child nodes reg
> properties cdon't represent the same address space as the
> parent's reg property.
What does in mean in the practice? What should I do instead?
> How much does the association of bit-offsets to power domains vary?
On EXYNOS5440 power domains are controlled by control and status registers
which are shared among all power domains. On other EXYNOS SoCs there are
separate control/status registers for each power domain.
> > Note that I only briefly reviewed the low-level structural aspects of
> > the binding that I mentioned above; I haven't thought about the binding
> > at a higher level of e.g. "does this binding conceptually make sense".
>
> This is unfortunately difficult to do :(
>
> >
> > > Node of a device using power domains must have a samsung,power-domain property
> > > defined with a phandle to respective power domain.
> > >
> > > -Example:
> > > +Example for Exynos4210 compatible power domain:
> > >
> > > lcd0: power-domain-lcd0 {
> > > compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd";
> > > reg = <0x10023C00 0x10>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +Example for Exynos5440 compatible power domains:
> > > +
> > > + power-domains at 00160000 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-power-domains", "simple-bus";
> > > + reg = <0x00160000 0x1000>;
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + pd_pcie: pcie-power-domain at 6 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pd";
> > > + reg = <6>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + pd_conn2: conn2-power-domain at 7 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pd";
> > > + reg = <7>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > Example of the node using power domain:
> > >
> > > node {
> > > Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi 2013-08-02 14:45:53.599392397 +0200
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi 2013-08-02 14:46:29.815391842 +0200
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,23 @@
> > > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + power-domains at 00160000 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-power-domains", "simple-bus";
> > > + reg = <0x00160000 0x1000>;
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + pd_pcie: pcie-power-domain at 6 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pd";
> > > + reg = <6>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + pd_conn2: conn2-power-domain at 7 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pd";
> > > + reg = <7>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > gic:interrupt-controller at 2E0000 {
> > > compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
> > > #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > > @@ -192,6 +209,7 @@
> > > phy-mode = "sgmii";
> > > clocks = <&clock 25>;
> > > clock-names = "stmmaceth";
> > > + samsung,power-domain = <&pd_conn2>;
> > > };
>
> This feels like a clock style binding would fit better:
> samsung,power-domain = <&pwr 7>;
>
> But there may be a better, more general way of handling this. I'm not
> sure how this relates to regulators and so on, and how other vendors
> handle this stuff...
Other vendors don't implement device tree for their power domains yet.
Also there is not much power domain users in the tree currently:
$ git grep pm_genpd_init
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c: pm_genpd_init(&pd->pd, NULL, !on);
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c: pm_genpd_init(&s3c64xx_always_on_pm_domains[i]->pd,
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c: pm_genpd_init(&s3c64xx_pm_domains[i]->pd, NULL, false);
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-r8a7779.c: pm_genpd_init(genpd, NULL, false);
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rmobile.c: pm_genpd_init(genpd, gov ? : &simple_qos_governor, false);
drivers/base/power/domain.c: * pm_genpd_init - Initialize a generic I/O PM domain object.
drivers/base/power/domain.c:void pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
include/linux/pm_domain.h:extern void pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
include/linux/pm_domain.h:static inline void pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> > >
> > > amba {
> > > @@ -240,6 +258,7 @@
> > > interrupts = <0 30 0>;
> > > clocks = <&clock 23>;
> > > clock-names = "sata";
> > > + samsung,power-domain = <&pd_conn2>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > ohci at 220000 {
> > > @@ -248,6 +267,7 @@
> > > interrupts = <0 29 0>;
> > > clocks = <&clock 24>;
> > > clock-names = "usbhost";
> > > + samsung,power-domain = <&pd_conn2>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > ehci at 221000 {
> > > @@ -256,6 +276,7 @@
> > > interrupts = <0 29 0>;
> > > clocks = <&clock 24>;
> > > clock-names = "usbhost";
> > > + samsung,power-domain = <&pd_conn2>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > pcie at 290000 {
> > > @@ -275,6 +296,7 @@
> > > #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0>;
> > > interrupt-map = <0x0 0 &gic 53>;
> > > + samsung,power-domain = <&pd_pcie>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > pcie at 2a0000 {
> > > @@ -294,5 +316,6 @@
> > > #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0>;
> > > interrupt-map = <0x0 0 &gic 56>;
> > > + samsung,power-domain = <&pd_pcie>;
> > > };
> > > };
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list